ISE05/17-18

Subject: security, terrorist attacks, counter-terrorism, police


  • In Singapore, the government has launched a nationwide CT campaign in 2016, taking a host of measures to educate its citizens and enhance public preparedness for terrorist attacks. This piece of Essentials briefly discusses such measures taken in Singapore, after a quick review of CT measures in Hong Kong.

Recent developments of counter-terrorism in Hong Kong

Measures to enhance public preparedness for terrorist attacks in Singapore

  • Singapore has not experienced any major terrorist attacks so far,11Legend symbol denoting There were two terrorist incidents in Singapore in the past. The Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine and Japanese Red Army hijacked the Laju ferry on 31 January 1974, while in March 1991 Pakistani terrorists hijacked a Singapore Airlines plane landed in Singapore. There was no hostage casualty in both cases. but it is considered as a likely attack target, partly due to its status as a global city and its participation with the Western allies in the fight against global terrorism. As a matter of fact, while there were occasional terrorist attacks in its neighbouring countries (e.g. Thailand and Indonesia) in recent years, it narrowly escaped a planned rocket attack against an iconic structure in Marina Bay upon the arrest of six militants located at Batam Island in Indonesia by the Indonesian authority in 2016.
  • In recent years, the terrorist threat level in Singapore has remained at the highest level.12Legend symbol denoting In June 2017, the Singapore Ministry of Home Affairs released the first Singapore Terrorism Threat Assessment, which clearly stated that ISIS was the most serious threat to Singapore. Moreover, about 75% of Singaporeans believed it was only a matter of time before the country experienced a terror attack, according to a newspaper poll in 2017. To prepare for a likely attack, the Singaporean government has boosted its CT capability by (a) upgrading the weapons of the police; (b) setting up a quick response team; and (c) installing extra 11 000 surveillance cameras nationwide in the next few years.
  • At the same time, the Singaporean government has also launched a public campaign namely "SGSecure" in September 2016, with a sharpened focus on improving public preparedness for attacks, rather than just building public awareness about terrorism. Launched as a "national movement", SGSecure aims to mobilize participation of all Singaporeans. While the Ministry of Home Affairs takes the lead, it also receives support from the Ministries for manpower, education, and health.
  • As regards the policy objectives, SGSecure aims to "sensitize, train and mobilize" the community to prevent and deal with terrorist attacks. First, it intends to promote public vigilance over suspicious behaviour or items; and knowledge over how to protect themselves when caught in an attack. Secondly, it intends to strengthen public cohesion, as racial and religious harmony is important for the country to stand together even in crisis. Thirdly, it intends to enhance public resilience, expediting the pace of recovery from an attack.
  • More specifically on policy measures, SGSecure pools together knowledge and skills in different sectors of the community to respond to terrorist attacks through the following programmes:

    (a)Live terror exercise in the community: Live exercises are held at the heart of local neighbourhoods such as popular food centre on "Emergency Preparedness Days" specially organized for local residents in each of all 89 districts in Singapore. Unlike conventional CT drills aiming to test the capability of different forces, these exercises allow residents to observe in person simulated terrorist attacks (e.g. knife or guns attacks or taking hostages). Local residents can also pick up life-saving skills in such events, such as cardiopulmonary resuscitation, improvised first aid, and the "Run Hide Tell" advice;

    (b)Countrywide home visits: A 400-people Home Team was formed under the Ministry of Home Affairs in 2016, targetting to visit all of the one million households in Singapore. These visits aim to get at least one member of each household prepared and equipped with the relevant knowledge and skills to keep their families safe in case of terrorist attack;

    (c)Training community leaders: Crisis response exercises are held to train community leaders in each district to respond to terrorist attacks with massive casualties on the one hand, and to manage potential communal tensions arising from racial or religious differences in the aftermath of an attack on the other. This is considered to be important to a multi-racial country like Singapore;

    (d)Workplace and school engagement: Companies are encouraged to appoint SGSecure representatives and register them with the government. These representatives will be the point of contact of the companies with the authorities, and will receive regular CT information. The government targets to have 30 000 of such representatives and 20 000 companies with a prepared workforce and protected work places by 2020.

    Separately, while school visits, exhibitions and talks are held for students, drills on an intruder in the campus have been organized to help schools respond effectively to terrorist attacks on school premises. Reportedly, some of these drills involved lockdown procedures; 13Legend symbol denoting According to a media report, at least three schools conducted such lockdown procedure drills in 2017. In such drills, a secret code was relayed to the students and teachers about an intruder entering into the school campus. Classrooms would then be locked and teachers and students would hide under desks or couches and stay away from windows. and

    (e)Mobile application and safety advice: The SGSecure app was launched in September 2016 as a one-stop portal for the public to receive alerts of major emergencies and send information to the emergency authorities. Users can key in the postal codes which will then show the emergencies in specific locations. There is also the "Run Hide Tell" advice disseminated via leaflets and online video.
  • The community-based approach in public preparedness for terrorist attacks seems to have been well-received in Singapore. More than 50 Emergency Preparedness Days were organized in 2017, with reported participation of at least 1 000 citizens in some cases. While more than 300 000 home visits (i.e. equivalent to 30% of the target) have been already made by December 2017, there have been more than 1 million downloads of the mobile app of SGSecure.


Prepared by CHEUNG Chi-fai
Research Office
Information Services Division
Legislative Council Secretariat
3 May 2018


Endnotes:

1.The annual estimate of terrorist attacks was made by Jane's Terrorism and Insurgency Center.

2.On 17 August 2015, the bombing in Bangkok killed 20 people including two visitors from Hong Kong. More than 100 people were injured too. Subsequent investigation found two suspects allegedly planted a bomb near the Erawan Shrine.

3.The ranking is based on a comparative study on different safety aspects of 60 cities by the Economist Intelligence Unit in 2017.

4.At the meeting of Panel on Security on 6 June 2017, Members raised concerns over what the public should do in a terrorist attack or in a suspected bomb threat incident like the one at Ocean Terminal in May 2017. Members were concerned how publicity and education materials related to terrorist attacks could be disseminated in a more effective and interesting manner.

5.See Ganor (2002).

6.One of the mostly cited advice is "Run Hide Tell". According to a study by Professor Larry Barton from the University of Central Florida which analysed 61 deadly attacks between 2006 and 2016, it was found that 73% of people chose to run and they suffered no or very minor injuries, compared to 20% people who chose to hide but one third of them were injured. In another poll under the terrorism research project funded by the European Union, it was found that those who had read the guidance on "Run Hide Tell" were much less likely to make risky phone calls during an attack. See Parker (2017).

7.Public education measures to enhance public preparedness are also adopted in other places. In the United States, for example, the New York City has "Ready New York" public education campaign which covers a wide range of hazards including but not limited to terrorist attacks. In the UK, apart from the well-publicized "Run Hide Tell" advice for the general public, local police forces also run programmes targeting business sectors from retail to hotels to help them prepare for terrorist attacks.

8.In Hong Kong, threats of terrorist attacks are categorized into three levels, namely "high", "moderate" and "low". A "high" threat level means that there is a possibility of attack, and there is specific intelligence suggesting that Hong Kong is likely to be a target. A "moderate" threat level means that there is a possibility of attack, but there is no specific intelligence suggesting that Hong Kong is likely to be a target. A "low" threat level means that the possibility of attack is low, and there is no specific intelligence of terrorist attacks. In cases of visits made by foreign national leaders, the threat level of attacks would be upgraded to "high" level.

9.About 100 Junior and Senior Police Call members took part in an anti-terror drill involving 500 government officers on 12 December 2017 at Hong Kong Coliseum. It was reported that the drill was the first exercise engaging the public.

10.The French government issued a "Flee Hide Alert" poster three weeks after the Paris attack in November 2015. The UK counter-terrorism police also issued "Run Hide Tell" advice in December 2015, replacing the previous "Stay Calm and Carry On" advice. The United States adopts a slightly different version in which "Tell" is replaced with "Fight". This is the advice for people having no place to hide from an imminent attack or they stand a chance to overcome the terrorist.

11.There were two terrorist incidents in Singapore in the past. The Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine and Japanese Red Army hijacked the Laju ferry on 31 January 1974, while in March 1991 Pakistani terrorists hijacked a Singapore Airlines plane landed in Singapore. There was no hostage casualty in both cases.

12.In June 2017, the Singapore Ministry of Home Affairs released the first Singapore Terrorism Threat Assessment, which clearly stated that ISIS was the most serious threat to Singapore. Moreover, about 75% of Singaporeans believed it was only a matter of time before the country experienced a terror attack, according to a newspaper poll in 2017.

13.According to a media report, at least three schools conducted such lockdown procedure drills in 2017. In such drills, a secret code was relayed to the students and teachers about an intruder entering into the school campus. Classrooms would then be locked and teachers and students would hide under desks or couches and stay away from windows.


References:

1.Decker, D. (2009) Before Disaster Strikes: Rate and Raise Public Preparedness.

2.Forliti, A. (2017) Run, Hide, Tell? London Attack Response Likely Saved Lives. Associated Press, 5 June 2017.

3.Ganor, B. (2002) Terror as a strategy of psychological warfare.

4.Government of Singapore. (2017) Singapore Terrorism Threat Assessment Report 2017.

5.Government of Singapore. (2018) SGSecure.

6.Homeland Security Institute. (2009) Public Role and Engagement in Counterterrorism Efforts: Implications of Israeli Practice for the US.

7.Hong Kong Police Force. (2018) Website.

8.Ministry of Manpower. (2018) Fact Sheet on SGSecure at Workplaces Programme.

9.Mok, D. (2017) Police and government units face chemical 'bomb' in anti-terror drill at Hong Kong Coliseum. SCMP, 13 December 2017.

10.Parker, D. (2017) Communications Requirements Report of PRIME.

11.Parliament of Singapore. (2017) Parliamentary Debates, 3 October 2017.

12.People's Association. (2018) Website.

13.Security Bureau. (2018) Website.

14.Terrorism Research Initiative. (2014) Perspectives on Terrorism.



Essentials are compiled for Members and Committees of the Legislative Council. They are not legal or other professional advice and shall not be relied on as such. Essentials are subject to copyright owned by The Legislative Council Commission (The Commission). The Commission permits accurate reproduction of Essentials for non-commercial use in a manner not adversely affecting the Legislative Council, provided that acknowledgement is made stating the Research Office of the Legislative Council Secretariat as the source and one copy of the reproduction is sent to the Legislative Council Library. The paper number of this issue of Essentials is ISE05/17-18.