A 13/14-24
Subsidiary Legislation / Instruments | L.N. No. | |
---|---|---|
1. | Inland Revenue (Exchange of Information relating to Taxes) (United States of America) Order | 54/2014 |
2. | News Agencies Registration (Amendment) Regulation 2014 | 55/2014 |
3. | Newspapers Registration and Distribution (Amendment) Regulation 2014 | 56/2014 |
4. | Overseas Lawyers (Qualification for Admission) (Amendment) Rules 2014 | 57/2014 |
1. | No. 96 | - | Quality Education Fund
Financial statements for the year ended 31 August 2013 |
(to be presented by Secretary for Education)
| |||
2. | No. 97 | - | Education Development Fund
Financial statements for the year ended 31 August 2013 |
(to be presented by Secretary for Education)
| |||
3. | No. 98 | - | Language Fund
Financial statements for the year ended 31 August 2013 |
(to be presented by Secretary for Education) |
(1) | of the number of cruise vessels berthing at the Cruise Terminal since its commissioning; whether it knows the average time taken, after berthing of a cruise vessel, to disperse all disembarking visitors to head towards their destinations, the respective percentages of such visitors taking various means of public transport to their destinations, and the number of occasions where disembarking visitors had to wait for more than an hour on average before boarding a taxi; if it has not compiled such statistics, of the reasons for that;
|
(2) | whether it has found out from the operator of the Cruise Terminal why there is always a long queue of disembarking visitors waiting for taxis; if it has, of the details; if not, the reasons for that; and
|
(3) | whether the authorities and the operator of the Cruise Terminal will introduce new measures to attract more taxis to enter the Cruise Terminal to pick up visitors on berthing days and step up publicity work to encourage visitors to go to their destinations by public transport such as feeder buses; if they will; of the details; if not, the reasons for that? |
(1) | of the number of industrial accidents in the past five years in which heavy-duty crane lorries overturned or the cranes of which snapped during lifting, as well as the resultant casualties;
|
(2) | whether it has compiled statistics on and analyzed the causes of the industrial accidents mentioned in (1) and improved the existing measures for regulating the operation of this type of heavy-duty machinery, such as increasing the penalties for relevant offences; if it has, of the details; if not, the reasons for that; and
|
(3) | whether it will make reference to the experience of other places and set a longest permissible service life for this type of heavy-duty machinery, with a view to minimizing accidents arising from ageing machinery, as well as require that such machinery can only be operated by professionally trained personnel with recognized qualifications; if it will, of the details and the implementation timetable; if not, the reasons for that? |
(1) | of the current number and percentage of the recipients of various financial assistance schemes under SFAA who are ethnic minorities, with a breakdown by ethnicity of such recipients;
|
(2) | whether the leaflets and application forms prepared by SFAA for financial assistance schemes are available in ethnic-minority languages; if so, of the details; if not, the reasons for that;
|
(3) | of the measures in place to ensure that schools will distribute leaflets and application forms of SFAA to ethnic-minority parents who have financial difficulties and will provide them with related assistance;
|
(4) | regarding the interpretation and translation services (including telephone interpretation and enquiries service, on-site (escort) interpretation service, on-sight interpretation service and written translation service) provided by "the Centre for Harmony and Enhancement of Ethnic Minority Residents" funded by the Home Affairs Department, whether it knows the usage of and relevant statistics on such services last year; and the number of times of the ethnic minorities using the services for applying for student financial assistance last year; and
|
(5) | whether SFAA has issued specific guidelines to frontline staff on how to handle enquiries or complaints made by applicants who know neither Chinese nor English; if it has, of the details of such guidelines; if not, the reasons for that? |
(1) | of the respective and aggregate costs of the Ten Major Infrastructure Projects expressed at today's prices, and their rates of increase as compared to the originally estimated costs; and
|
(2) | whether the authorities will consider assessing afresh the urgency of these infrastructure projects, and postpone the completion of those projects which are less urgent, so as to alleviate the pressure on construction manpower during peak construction period; if they will, of the details; if not, the reasons for that? |
(1) | given that last year, the Financial Secretary had met with Members who initiated a filibuster, whether the Government has lobbied the aforesaid Members this year, urging them to withdraw some or all of their CSAs and explaining to them (i) the consequences and impacts of failure to pass the Bill before the deadline, and (ii) the justifications for the Government not distributing $10,000 to each member of the public and not implementing a universal retirement protection scheme this year; if it has, of the details of the post titles of the officials who had undertaken the lobbying task, the dates and time, venues and formats of the meetings with those Members, as well as the contents of their discussions; if not, the reasons for that;
|
(2) | whether it has assessed the amount of additional public expenditure that will be caused by the filibuster; if it has, of the details, if not, the reasons for that;
|
(3) | whether it has assessed the specific impacts of the filibuster on the operation of various government departments; if it has, of the departments that will be affected and the relevant impacts (including those relating to service provision and additional expenditure caused, etc.); if not, the reasons for that;
|
(4) | of the relief measures put forward in the 2014-2015 Budget the implementation of which by the Government will be hindered by the filibuster, as well as the amounts involved in those measures;
|
(5) | whether it has assessed the impacts of the filibuster on the relationship between the Executive Authorities and the Legislature; if it has, of the details; if not, the reasons for that;
|
(6) | whether it has assessed the perception of people from various sectors of the community on the filibuster, including their impressions of the Government and this Council, as well as the responses of various political parties to the filibuster; if it has, of the details; if not, the reasons for that;
|
(7) | whether it has requested the President of the Legislative Council to "put an end to the filibuster"; if it has, of the details; if not, the reasons for that;
|
(8) | as the Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury has pointed out that the funds on account provided can only meet around two months' operating expenses of the Government, whether it has assessed when the Government will face a "fiscal cliff" and what specific situation that Hong Kong will face when the Bill is not yet passed by the end of May this year; whether there are measures in place to avert a fiscal cliff; if there are, of the details; if not, the consequences of that; and
|
(9) | whether it has formulated corresponding plans to deal with the situation that the Bill could not be passed by this Council by the end of May this year; if it has, of the details, and whether it will consider seeking vote on account again; if it will, when it will submit the application; if not, the reasons for that? |
(1) | whether it knows (i) the average monthly usage, (ii) the year-on-year growth rate of the monthly usage, (iii) the average upload and download speeds, and (iv) the average disconnection rate, of the public and private Wi-Fi services in various District Council districts in the past three years; of the district with the highest usage of Wi-Fi services in the past three years;
|
(2) | whether it has assessed if the data transmission speed of GovWi-Fi service meets the needs of general users; if the assessment outcome is in the affirmative, of the details; if the assessment outcome is in the negative, the reasons for that;
|
(3) | of the locations at which the additional Wi-Fi hotspots mentioned above will be installed; with the doubling of the number of Wi-Fi hotspots to 20 000, of the extent to which the coverage of GovWiFi service will be expanded;
|
(4) | whether it has plans to launch a pilot scheme, in the district with the highest usage or highest usage growth rate of GovWi-Fi service, to provide full service coverage for the district concerned; if so, of the details; if not, the reasons for that;
|
(5) | whether it has carried out technical upgrading of GovWi-Fi service across the territory in the past three years; whether it has plans at present to carry out technical upgrading of GovWi-Fi service; if so, of the details; if not, the reasons for that;
|
(6) | whether it has considered providing GovWi-Fi service at all tourist attractions in Hong Kong;
|
(7) | of the expenditure, as estimated by the Government, required for upgrading the quality of GovWi-Fi service to a level on par with that of private Wi-Fi services; and
|
(8) | as the Government indicated in the Digital 21 Strategy that it would build Hong Kong as a Wi-Fi city, of the amount of public money spent so far on implementing the relevant measures? |
(1) | whether it knows the details of each of the projects the development rights of which were granted by MTRCL by way of tendering from 2003 to 2013, including (i) the year of tender, (ii) the project name, (iii) the developer, (iv) the land premium per square foot of floor space, (v) the residential gross floor area ("GFAs"), (vi) the number of residential flats, (vii) the average number of residential floors, (viii) the GFA of the shopping mall, (ix) the area of community and recreational facilities, (x) the number of parking spaces, and (xi) the completion date or the expected completion date (set out in table form);
|
(2) | whether it knows the details of the projects for which MTRCL conducted tender exercises between 2003 and 2013 with the result of unsuccessful tendering, including (i) the years of tender, (ii) the site locations, (iii) MTRCL's expected land premiums per square foot of floor space during the tender, (iv) the areas of construction sites, (v) the residential GFAs, and (vi) the numbers of residential flats (set out in table form);
|
(3) | given that MTRCL did not grant the development rights of any project in the past three years, and according to the Secretary, "the Government should make more effort and MTRCL should try hard", whether the Government has conducted a review with MTRCL in this respect; if it has not, of the reasons for that; if it has, the main reasons for unsuccessful tendering, and whether MTRCL will relax the tender conditions to increase the prospects of granting the development rights;
|
(4) | given the recent unsuccessful re-tendering of the project above Tin Wing Light Rail Transit Station, whether the Government will resume the site for production of Home Ownership Scheme flats; if it will, whether the plot ratio of the project concerned will be higher than those of existing residential buildings in the vicinity; whether it will consult the local residents on the development of the site; and
|
(5) | of the details of the projects the development rights of which are currently held by MTRCL, and whether the Government has set any timetable for reviewing the development rights concerned? |
(1) | given that under Articles 10 and 11 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, states parties shall take all necessary measures to ensure effective enjoyment of the inherent right to life by PWDs on an equal basis with others and ensure the protection and safety of PWDs in situations of risk, whether the authorities have assessed if the Code complies with the requirements of such articles;
|
(2) | whether there were PWDs being injured or killed in fire in the past five years due to the lack of proper escape facilities in buildings; if so, of the number of cases each year and the causes of their injuries;
|
(3) | of the number of existing social welfare service facilities and education facilities for PWDs, including special schools, residential care homes, day care service centres and district support centres, not meeting the requirements of the Code, as well as the names of the service units concerned; and
|
(4) | of the timetable for amending the Code and the amendments to be made; if no timetable is available, of the reasons for that? |
(1) | of the existing number of public parking spaces in Lei Yue Mun and their geographical distribution; the demand for public parking spaces in the district; whether it knows the respective utilization rates of the two aforesaid open-air car-parks during peak hours at night during holidays;
|
(2) | whether, in order to alleviate the tight supply of parking spaces in Lei Yue Mun, it will consider specifying in the land sale conditions of the aforesaid and the neighbouring private residential developments the provision of more public parking spaces by the developers; if it will, of the details; if not, the reasons for that;
|
(3) | whether it will, during the construction of the aforesaid private residential development, take measures (e.g. providing new temporary car-parks) to prevent the shortage of public parking spaces in Lei Yue Mun from worsening; if it will, of the specific measures to be taken, the implementation timetable and the number of public parking spaces to be provided; if not, the reasons for that; and
|
(4) | whether it will, from the perspective of promoting the long-term development of district tourism, enhance the ancillary transport facilities in Lei Yue Mun, including providing additional public parking spaces and more convenient places for coach parking, as well as addressing the traffic congestion problem in the district; if it will, of the details; if not, the reasons for that? |
(1) | whether it knows the current number of security guard posts available for Category B Permit holders across the territory and, among them, the number of those available for Category A Permit holders, with a breakdown by the 18 District Council districts;
|
(2) | of the current number of Category A Permit holders who are above the age of 65;
|
(3) | of the number of Category B Permit applications/renewal applications rejected in each of the past five years for the reason that the applicants were 65 years old or above; and
|
(4) | whether the authorities will request SGSIA to (i) consider expanding the types of buildings for which Category A Permit holders, are allowed to perform guarding work, and (ii) consider, by drawing reference to the criteria for issuing Category A Permits, relaxing the upper age limit for Category B Permit holders; if they will, of the details; if not, the reasons for that? |
(1) | of the estimated number of jobs in the construction industry to be created by the major infrastructure projects relating to the development of the East Lantau Metropolis; whether it has assessed if there will be adequate local workers in the construction industry to meet the manpower demand of such projects; if it has assessed and the result is in the negative, whether the authorities will import foreign labour; if so, of the details; if not, the reasons for that;
|
(2) | as the Government has stated that it has carried out a preliminary review of the relevant supporting infrastructure at HKBCF to explore the feasibility of developing major shopping, dining, entertainment and hotel facilities there, of the details of the preliminary review and the timetable for the completion of such commercial facilities; and
|
(3) | given that HZMB and the Tuen Mun-Chek Lap Kok Link are to be completed in 2016 and 2018 respectively, whether it has assessed the economic loss arising from failure to concurrently complete the commercial facilities to be developed at HKBCF; if it has assessed, of the result; if not, the reasons for that? |
(1) | whether it knows, based on the latest assessment, the official commissioning date of the XRL Hong Kong Section; whether it has assessed the impacts of the delay of the XRL project on the overall cost of the project as well as on the economy and overall development of Hong Kong; if it has assessed, of the outcome and the corresponding measures to be taken by the authorities;
|
(2) | whether it has reviewed if the existing monitoring system is unable to make the Government aware earlier of the delay in the XRL project; if it has reviewed, of the outcome; whether the Government will comprehensively review and adjust the monitoring system; if it will, of the details; if not, the reasons for that;
|
(3) | whether the Government had in the past verified all the information on the XRL project (including results of works progress assessments) submitted to it by MTRCL; if it had, of the method and findings of the verification, and whether it had imposed any penalties when it found that the information was incorrect and the corresponding measures taken; if it had not verified, the reasons for that, and whether it will step up the verification efforts in the future; how it ensures that MTRCL will not delay notifying the Government of the latest information on works progress or conceal such information from the Government; and
|
(4) | given that the Secretary said that he had instructed the Director of Highways to conduct an independent review and assessment on the delay of the XRL project, of the specific areas covered by such review and assessment, the relevant details, the expected time of completion and submission of report, and whether the Government will make public the relevant report? |
(1) | of the number of retired athletes who applied for joining HKACEP and the number of those who received assistance under HKACEP, together with a breakdown by the support programme (including the language enrichment course, life skills and mentorship programme, scholarship programme for tertiary education, career programme, etc.), in the past five years; the amount of grants receivable by an athlete under HKACEP, and whether they are granted any subsistence allowance;
|
(2) | of the number of retiring athletes assisted by AIEVDP, the areas in which these athletes were provided with support and the amount of grants received by them, and the number of athletes who benefitted from AIEVDP and its percentage in the total number of serving full-time athletes, in the past five years; and
|
(3) | given that the aforesaid two programmes have operated for more than five years, whether the authorities will conduct a review to perfect them; if they will, of the details; if not, the reasons for that? |
(1) | of the number of residential property transactions subject to the payment of SSD as well as the total value of the properties concerned and the total amount of duty involved, in each month since the implementation of SSD in November 2010, together with a breakdown by District Council ("DC") district where the relevant properties are located; and
|
(2) | of the number of residential property transactions subject to the payment of BSD as well as the total value of the properties concerned and the total amount of duty involved, in each month since the implementation of BSD in October 2012, together with a breakdown by DC district where the relevant properties are located? |
(1) | the causes of the relatively higher growth rates in the total loans and advances in the first two months of this year; whether an increase in local economic activities was one of the causes; if so, of the contribution of such economic activities to the growth in the gross domestic product;
|
(2) | the relatively higher growth rates in the total loans and advances in the first two months of this year can mainly be attributed to which industries' increased demand for funds; and
|
(3) | whether the relatively higher growth rates in the total loans and advances will increase the systemic risks of Hong Kong's financial system; if it has studied and the outcome is in the affirmative, of the authorities' corresponding measures? |
(1) | of the number of complaints received in the past five years by the authorities from workers injured at work about being harassed by recovery agents or law firm representatives in such places;
|
(2) | how LD and various public hospitals currently deal with the situation of unauthorized persons staying in such places; whether the authorities will explore the setting up of restricted zones in such places; if so, of the details; if not, what other measures are in place to prevent workers injured at work from being harassed in such places;
|
(3) | of the details of the publicity efforts currently made by the authorities to convey to workers injured at work the risks involved in hiring recovery agents and lawyers who engage in champerty; whether they will step up the publicity efforts; and
|
(4) | of the respective numbers of suspected champerty cases relating to work injury claims investigations into which were conducted and prosecutions on which were instituted, by the authorities in the past five years and, among such cases, the number of persons concerned who were convicted and the details of these cases; whether they will step up the related investigation and prosecution efforts; if so, of the details; if not, the reasons for that? |
(1) | of the current number of public spaces in Hong Kong, and among them, the number of those that are managed by the property management companies appointed by the property owners ("private management") and the number of those that are open around the clock, with a breakdown by the 18 District Council districts;
|
(2) | whether it knows the number of cases in the past three years in which members of the public were injured in public spaces under private management, with a breakdown by type of the facilities concerned;
|
(3) | whether it received any complaint from members of the public in the past three years about mismanagement of public spaces under private management;
|
(4) | whether a mechanism is currently in place for monitoring the management of public spaces under private management; if such a mechanism is not in place, of the reasons for that, and whether it will consider formulating such a mechanism; and
|
(5) | whether the Government took the initiative in the past three years to carry out regular and surprise inspections of various public spaces under private management, in order to check if such spaces are suitable for use by the public; if it did, of the number of such inspections and the findings; if not, the reasons for that? |
Industry | 2003 | 2004 | 2012 | 2013 |
Retail | ||||
Catering | ||||
Estate management and security service | ||||
Cleaning service | ||||
Elderly service | ||||
Land transport | ||||
Transportation, storage, postal and courier services | ||||
Manufacturing | ||||
Import and export trade | ||||
Wholesale | ||||
Information and communications | ||||
Finance and insurance | ||||
Electricity and gas supply | ||||
Sewerage, waste management and remediation | ||||
Accommodation and food service | ||||
Overall |
First Reading
| |||
1. | Statute Law (Miscellaneous Provisions) Bill 2014
| ||
2. | Insurance Companies (Amendment) Bill 2014
| ||
3. | Electronic Health Record Sharing System Bill
| ||
4. | Construction Workers Registration (Amendment) Bill 2014
| ||
Second Reading (Debate to be adjourned)
| |||
1. | Statute Law (Miscellaneous Provisions) Bill 2014 | : | The Secretary for Justice
|
2. | Insurance Companies (Amendment) Bill 2014 | : | Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury
|
3. | Electronic Health Record Sharing System Bill | : | Secretary for Food and Health
|
4. | Construction Workers Registration (Amendment) Bill 2014 | : | Secretary for Development
|
Committee Stage and Third Reading
| |||
Appropriation Bill 2014 | : | The Financial Secretary
| |
Amendments to heads of estimates in
Committee of the whole Council on the Appropriation Bill 2014 | |||
Hon Albert CHAN, Hon LEUNG Kwok-hung, Hon CHAN Chi-chuen, Hon Claudia MO, Hon WONG Yuk-man, Hon SIN Chung-kai, Hon James TO, Dr Hon Helena WONG, Hon Gary FAN, Hon WU Chi-wai, Hon LEE Cheuk-yan, Dr Hon Fernando CHEUNG, Hon CHEUNG Kwok-che and Hon Cyd HO to move the Committee stage amendments in the Appendix.
| |||
(These amendments were also issued on 17 and 24 April 2014
under LC Paper Nos. CB(3)566/13-14 and CB(3)573/13-14 respectively) | |||
(Debate and voting arrangements for Committee stage amendments to the Appropriation Bill 2014 (issued on 28 April 2014 under LC Paper No. CB(3) 594/13-14))
| |||
Other Public Officers to attend the Committee stage | : | The Chief Secretary for Administration
The Secretary for Justice Secretary for Transport and Housing Secretary for Home Affairs Secretary for Labour and Welfare Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development Secretary for Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Secretary for Security Secretary for Education Secretary for the Civil Service Secretary for Food and Health Secretary for the Environment Secretary for Development Under Secretary for Home Affairs Under Secretary for the Environment Under Secretary for Transport and Housing Under Secretary for Security Under Secretary for Food and Health Under Secretary for Education Under Secretary for Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Under Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development Under Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury Under Secretary for Development |