ISE25/20-21

Subject: welfare services, social welfare and services


Hong Kong

Japan

Singapore

Concluding remarks

  • Homelessness is a mounting public concern in Hong Kong, especially given the growing number of street sleepers. The situation has been further aggravated by the recent COVID-19 pandemic. As such, there have been calls for the Government to strength the effort to address the issue. In Japan, it has put in place a national homeless law almost 20 years ago that focuses on supporting homeless people in achieving self-reliance through employment assistance. At the local level, Tokyo has set up self-reliance support centres to serve such purpose, with a range of employment assistance including work trial opportunity to reduce homeless people's anxiety over employment. These measures have yielded generally desirable outcomes, with the homeless population dropped markedly over the past two decades. This apart, preventive support services dedicated to people on the brink of homelessness complemented other initiatives also help contain the problem associated with street sleeping. Moreover, targeted help in facilitating this sort of unemployed persons to secure employment in sectors that are facing labour shortage can potentially provide added benefit to the relevant businesses as well. In Singapore, while its basic services model for the homeless is similar to Hong Kong's, it has in recent years enhanced collaboration with NGOs via a cooperation network to, among others, facilitate more outreaching services and the opening up of more temporarily safe places/shelters in the community for the homeless. Though homelessness is a complex matter involving a lot of personal and social issues, these overseas examples, especially positive experience arising from selected initiatives, may shed light on strengthening support measures for the homeless in Hong Kong.


Prepared by Dickson CHUNG
Research Office
Information Services Division
Legislative Council Secretariat
26 August 2021


Endnotes:

1.There is no internationally agreed definition of homelessness. A useful reference could be the European Typology of Homelessness and Housing Exclusion ("ETHOS"), a typology developed by the European Federation of National Organizations Working with the Homeless. Apart from people living rough (or so-called "street sleepers", i.e. living in the streets or public spaces without a shelter that can be defined as living quarters), the "ETHOS Light" (the typology's shorter version) proposes that the scope of homeless populations could be extended to cases ranging from those who are living in non-conventional dwellings, emergency accommodation or accommodation for the homeless to institutionalised people who are staying longer than needed in health institutions or penal institutions due to lack of housing prior to release. See Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2021a).

2.See Hong Kong Council of Social Service (2017), I. CARE Programme, The Chinese University of Hong Kong and City-Youth Empowerment Project, Department of Applied Social Science, City University of Hong Kong (2016), Kornatowski, G. and Wong, H. (2018) and Minutes of Meeting of the Panel on Welfare Services (2017).

3.See GovHK (2017), Hong Kong Council of Social Service (2017), I. CARE Programme, The Chinese University of Hong Kong and City-Youth Empowerment Project, Department of Applied Social Science, City University of Hong Kong (2016), Kornatowski, G. and Wong, H. (2018), Minutes of Joint Meeting of the Panel on Welfare Services and Panel on Food Safety and Environmental Hygiene (2017), Minutes of Meeting of the Panel on Welfare Services (2017 and 2020), Social Welfare Department (2020a and 2021) and 黃洪(2018年).

4.See Social Welfare Department (2017).

5.In calculating the number of registered street sleepers per 100 000 population in 2011-2012 and 2019-2020, the population in mid-2012 and mid-2020 is used. See Census and Statistics Department (2021), Legislative Council Secretariat (2019) and Social Welfare Department (2021).

6.See Social Welfare Department (2021).

7.Ibid.

8.Respondents excluded individuals already staying in overnight or temporary accommodation for street sleepers. See I. CARE Programme, The Chinese University of Hong Kong and City-Youth Empowerment Project, Department of Applied Social Science, City University of Hong Kong (2016).

9.See I. CARE Programme, The Chinese University of Hong Kong and City-Youth Empowerment Project, Department of Applied Social Science, City University of Hong Kong (2016), Kornatowski, G. and Wong, H. (2018) and Minutes of Meeting of the Panel on Welfare Services (2017).

10.The three NGOs subsidized by SWD to operate Integrated Services Teams for Street Sleepers are Christian Concern for the Homeless Association, Salvation Army and St. James' Settlement. See Social Welfare Department (2020a).

11.NGOs are granted a higher degree of autonomy in setting the duration of stay for their self-financing places vis-a-vis subvented places. Lodgers of subvented places are generally allowed to stay for six months at most, although responsible social workers have a certain level of flexibility in extending the period of stay based on the needs of individual cases. See GovHK (2018), Minutes of Meeting of the Panel on Welfare Services (2018) and Social Welfare Department (2020a).

12.During 2011-2012 and 2019-2020, the number of subvented places only rose by 10% from 202 to 222, and increased slightly to 228 in 2020-2021. See Legislative Council Secretariat (2019) and Social Welfare Department (2020a and 2021).

13.See Social Welfare Department (2016b and 2021).

14.See Labour and Welfare Bureau (2018) and Social Welfare Department (2016a).

15.See Minutes of Joint Meeting of the Panel on Home Affairs and Panel on Welfare Services (2013).

16.Also, homeless people are not eligible for Compassionate Rehousing if they have ownership of local residential properties. See Social Welfare Department (2016a).

17.See Okamoto, Y. et al. (2004).

18.The Homeless Act was intended to be a time-limited law, initially set to expire in 2012 (i.e. 10 years after its promulgation). Yet because there were still nearly 10 000 homeless people in 2012, the Homeless Act was extended for five years to 2017. Although the number of homeless people further decreased to 5 500 in 2017, aging of the homeless and lengthened duration of street sleeping were registered in the national survey. To deal with these emerging issues, the expiry year of the Homeless Act was extended for another 10 years to 2027. See 東京都福祉保健局:《ホームレスの自立支援等に関する東京都実施計画(第4次)》(2019年), 厚生労働省(2012年), 厚生労働省:《ホームレスの実態に関する全国調査(概数調査)結果》(2017年), 参議院(2012年) and 衆議院(2017年).

19.See Kiener, J. (2014), Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2021b), 東京都福祉保健局:《ホームレスの自立支援等に関する東京都実施計画(第4次)》(2019年) and 厚生労働省:《ホームレスの自立の支援等に関する特別措置法》(2017年).

20.See Kiener, J. and Mizuuchi, T. (2018) and 東京都福祉保健局:《ホームレスの自立支援等に関する東京都実施計画(第4次)》(2019年).

21.See Kiener, J. and Mizuuchi, T. (2018), 東京都財務局(2020年), 東京都福祉保健局:《ホームレスの自立支援等に関する東京都実施計画(平成26年策定、第3次)に定める施策評価書》(2019年) and 東京都福祉保健局:《ホームレスの自立支援等に関する東京都実施計画(第4次)》(2019年).

22.See Kiener, J. and Mizuuchi, T. (2018), 東京ジョブステーション(2020年 and 2021年), 東京都福祉保健局:《ホームレスの自立支援等に関する東京都実施計画(平成26年策定、第3次)に定める施策評価書》(2019年) and 東京都福祉保健局:《ホームレスの自立支援等に関する東京都実施計画(第4次)》(2019年).

23.The career experience programme is run in four prefectures which have relatively more homeless people (i.e. Aichi, Kanagawa, Osaka and Tokyo). Based on public domain information, the levels of incentive pay and subsidy in Tokyo appear not available. In the programme implemented in Osaka, participating employers will be rewarded with a maximum subsidy of ¥18,000 (HK$1,269) for programme up to 16 days and participants will receive an incentive pay of ¥3,000 (HK$212) per day. See 大阪ホームレス就業支援センター(2021年), 東京都福祉保健局:《ホームレスの自立支援等に関する東京都実施計画(平成26年策定、第3次)に定める施策評価書》(2019年) and 厚生労働省(2006年).

24.In sum, there were an annual average of 7 100 people getting a job with the help of the Employment Council during 2014-2017, representing its considerable effort into providing employment opportunities for those in need. See 東京都福祉保健局:《ホームレスの自立支援等に関する東京都実施計画(平成26年策定、第3次)に定める施策評価書》(2019年).

25.See 東京都福祉保健局:《ホームレスの自立支援等に関する東京都実施計画(平成26年策定、第3次)に定める施策評価書》(2019年) and 東京都福祉保健局:《ホームレスの自立支援等に関する東京都実施計画(第4次)》(2019年).

26.See 東京都福祉保健局(2020年).

27.The extent of reduction is similar to that of the whole country. At the national level, the number of homeless people was reduced by 85% from 25 296 to 3 824 over the same period, or from 20 to 3 on a per 100 000 population basis. See 東京都総務局統計部(2006年 and 2021年), 厚生労働省(2007年 and 2021年) and 総務省統計局(2010年 and 2021年).

28.See 東京都教育委員会(2021年), 東京都福祉保健局:《ホームレスの自立支援等に関する東京都実施計画(平成26年策定、第3次)に定める施策評価書》(2019年) and 東京都福祉保健局:《ホームレスの自立支援等に関する東京都実施計画(第4次)》(2019年).

29.See 東京都福祉保健局(2018年).

30.The loan debts can be written off if participants find a job in long-term care services within one year upon completion of the course and continue to work for at least six months. See TOKYOチャレンジネット:《介護職支援コース》(2021年) and TOKYOチャレンジネット:《仕事・生活・住居・資金、お困りごとは》(2021年).

31.See 東京都福祉保健局:《ホームレスの自立支援等に関する東京都実施計画(平成26年策定、第3次)に定める施策評価書(2019年).

32.See Ng, K.H. (2019) and Singapore Department of Statistics (2021).

33.Besides transitional shelters, there are also welfare homes managed by NGOs with government funding. Welfare homes are targeted specifically at destitute persons who lack family support and cannot care for themselves, so it is believed that only a small proportion of homeless people are eligible. For these destitute persons, admission to welfare homes is statutory under the Destitute Persons Act. See Ministry of Social and Family Development (2018), Parliament of Singapore (2019, 2020a and 2020b) and Singapore Statutes Online (2020).

34.See Ministry of Social and Family Development (2019), Parliament of Singapore (2020a and 2021a) and The Straits Times (2019).

35.See Parliament of Singapore (2021a) and The Pride (2020).

36.See Bless Community Services (2020 and 2021), Parliament of Singapore (2020a, 2020b, 2021a and 2021c) and The Online Citizen (2020).

37.To curb COVID-19 infections, a nationwide lockdown was imposed between April and June 2020. The requirement that every individual must stay home during the lockdown, unless with specific reasons (e.g. working for essential service providers, get essential goods and services), caused S3Ps to expand the operating hours to let the homeless stay indoors for a whole day. See Gov.sg (2020) and Parliament of Singapore (2020b).

38.See Parliament of Singapore (2021b).


References:

Hong Kong

1.Census and Statistics Department. (2021) Table 1A: Population by Sex and Age Group.

2.GovHK. (2017) LCQ6: Support Services for Street Sleepers.

3.GovHK. (2018) LCQ12: Policy on and Support for Homeless People.

4.Hong Kong Council of Social Service. (2017) Submission on Policies on Street Sleepers and the Relevant Support Services and Actions/Measures. LC Paper No. CB(2)1093/16-17(02).

5.I. CARE Programme, The Chinese University of Hong Kong and City-Youth Empowerment Project, Department of Applied Social Science, City University of Hong Kong. (2016) Homeless Outreach Population Estimation Hong Kong 2015: Research Report.

6.Kornatowski, G. and Wong, H. (2018) Homeless in Hong Kong: The Evolution of Official Homeless Assistance and the Context of Housing.

7.Labour and Welfare Bureau. (2018) Administration's Response to Welfare Support for the Homeless. LC Paper No. CB(2)1594/17-18(01).

8.Legislative Council Secretariat. (2019) Statistical Highlights on Street Sleepers in Hong Kong. LC Paper No. ISSH17/18-19.

9.Minutes of Joint Meeting of the Panel on Home Affairs and Panel on Welfare Services of the Legislative Council. (2013) 22 July. LC Paper No. CB(2)1760/12-13.

10.Minutes of Joint Meeting of the Panel on Welfare Services and Panel on Food Safety and Environmental Hygiene of the Legislative Council. (2017) 27 March. LC Paper No. CB(2)2007/16-17.

11.Minutes of Meeting of the Panel on Welfare Services of the Legislative Council. (2017) 13 February. LC Paper No. CB(2)1484/16-17.

12.Minutes of Meeting of the Panel on Welfare Services of the Legislative Council. (2018) 9 April. LC Paper No. CB(2)1504/17-18.

13.Minutes of Meeting of the Panel on Welfare Services of the Legislative Council. (2020) 11 May. LC Paper No. CB(2)1493/19-20.

14.Social Welfare Department. (2015) Replies to Initial Written Questions raised by Finance Committee Members in Examining the Estimates of Expenditure 2015-16.

15.Social Welfare Department. (2016a) Compassionate Rehousing and Alternative Housing Assistance.

16.Social Welfare Department. (2016b) Replies to Initial Written Questions raised by Finance Committee Members in Examining the Estimates of Expenditure 2016-17.

17.Social Welfare Department. (2017) Replies to Initial Written Questions raised by Finance Committee Members in Examining the Estimates of Expenditure 2017-18.

18.Social Welfare Department. (2020a) Administration's Paper on Social Welfare Support Services for Street Sleepers. LC Paper No. CB(2)921/19-20(04).

19.Social Welfare Department. (2020b) Replies to Initial Written Questions raised by Finance Committee Members in Examining the Estimates of Expenditure 2020-21.

20.Social Welfare Department. (2021) Replies to Initial Written Questions raised by Finance Committee Members in Examining the Estimates of Expenditure 2021-22.

21.黃洪:《深水埗區露宿者研究報告》,2018年。


Japan

22.Kiener, J. (2014) Social Networks of Homeless People under the Influence of Homeless Self-Sufficiency Support Centres in Japan.

23.Kiener, J. and Mizuuchi, T. (2018) Homelessness and Homeless Policies in the Context of the Residual Japanese Welfare State.

24.Okamoto, Y. et al. (2004) Homelessness and Housing in Japan.

25.TOKYOチャレンジネット:《介護職支援コース》2021年。

26.TOKYOチャレンジネット:《仕事・生活・住居・資金、お困りごとは》2021年。

27.大阪ホームレス就業支援センター:《職場体験講習を利用してください》2021年。

28.東京ジョブステーション:《組織のご案内》2020年。

29.東京ジョブステーション:《事業の内容》2021年。

30.東京都財務局:《令和3年度予算要求概要:福祉保健局》2020年。

31.東京都教育委員会:《人権教育》2021年。

32.東京都福祉保健局:《住居喪失不安定就労者等の実態に関する調査報告書》2018年。

33.東京都福祉保健局:《ホームレスの自立支援等に関する東京都実施計画(平成26年策定、第3次)に定める施策評価書》2019年。

34.東京都福祉保健局:《ホームレスの自立支援等に関する東京都実施計画(第4次)》2019年。

35.東京都福祉保健局:《ホームレス対策の現状について》2020年。

36.東京都総務局統計部:《平成12年(2000年)11月~平成17年(2005年)10月までの人口推計(補正)》2006年。

37.東京都総務局統計部:《東京都の人口(推計)(補正)》2021年。

38.厚生労働省:《現行ホームレス施策の概要等》2006年。

39.厚生労働省:《ホームレスの実態に関する全国調査報告書》2007年。

40.厚生労働省:《ホームレスの実態に関する全国調査(概数調査)結果》2012年。

41.厚生労働省:《ホームレスの実態に関する全国調査(概数調査)結果》2017年。

42.厚生労働省:《ホームレスの自立の支援等に関する特別措置法》2017年。

43.厚生労働省:《ホームレスの実態に関する全国調査(概数調査)結果について》2021年。

44.参議院:《ホームレスの自立の支援等に関する特別措置法の一部を改正する法律》2012年。

45.衆議院:《ホームレスの自立の支援等に関する特別措置法の一部を改正する法律案の概要》2017年。

46.総務省統計局:《年齢(5歳階級)男女別推計人口(平成15年2月確定値平成15年6月概算値)》2010年。

47.総務省統計局:《年齢(5歳階級)、男女別人口(2021年2月平成27年国勢調査を基準とする推計値、2021年7月概算値)》2021年。


Singapore

48.Bless Community Services. (2020) S3P: A Bless Community Services Initiative Thanksgiving Report.

49.Bless Community Services. (2021) S3P@YCKC.

50.Gov.sg (2020) What You Can and Cannot Do during the Circuit Breaker Period. 11 April.

51.Ministry of Social and Family Development. (2018) Welfare Homes.

52.Ministry of Social and Family Development. (2019) MSFCares Issue 12.

53.Ng, K.H. (2019) Homeless in Singapore: Results from a Nationwide Street Count.

54.Parliament of Singapore. (2019) Number of Displaced Persons in Shelters.

55.Parliament of Singapore. (2020a) Addressing Homelessness Problem as Reported in Study of over 1,000 People Sleeping in the Rough.

56.Parliament of Singapore. (2020b) Assistance for Rough Sleepers and Measures to Help Them Cope with COVID-19 Circuit Breaker Conditions.

57.Parliament of Singapore. (2021a) Committee of Supply - Head I (Ministry of Social and Family Development).

58.Parliament of Singapore. (2021b) Numbers Helped under Partners Engaging and Empowering Rough Sleepers Network.

59.Parliament of Singapore. (2021c) Support for Homeless People with Health Problems.

60.Singapore Department of Statistics. (2021) M810001 - Indicators On Population, Annual.

61.Singapore Statutes Online. (2020) Destitute Persons Act (Chapter 78).

62.The Online Citizen. (2020) COVID-19: Shelters for the Homeless Hit Capacity as "Circuit Breaker" Measures Took Effect in S'pore. 13 April.

63.The Pride. (2020) Tackling Homelessness during a Pandemic. 14 June.

64.The Straits Times. (2019) Look back 2019: Landmark Study Highlights Issues of Homeless People. 18 December.


Others

65.Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2021a) HC3.1. Homeless Population.

66.Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2021b) HC3.2. National Strategies for Combating Homelessness.



Essentials are compiled for Members and Committees of the Legislative Council. They are not legal or other professional advice and shall not be relied on as such. Essentials are subject to copyright owned by The Legislative Council Commission (The Commission). The Commission permits accurate reproduction of Essentials for non-commercial use in a manner not adversely affecting the Legislative Council. Please refer to the Disclaimer and Copyright Notice on the Legislative Council website at www.legco.gov.hk for details. The paper number of this issue of Essentials is ISE25/20-21.