A 12/13-9
Subsidiary Legislation / Instrument | L.N. No. |
---|---|
Competition Ordinance (Commencement) Notice 2012 | 177/2012 |
1. | No. 28 | - | Estate Agents Authority Annual Report 2011/12 |
(to be presented by Secretary for Transport and Housing)
| |||
2. | No. 29 | - | Annual Report 2011 to the Chief Executive by the Commissioner on Interception of Communications and Surveillance (together with a statement under section 49(4) of the Interception of Communications and Surveillance Ordinance) |
(to be presented by Secretary for Security)
| |||
3. | Report No. 5/12-13 of the House Committee on Consideration of Subsidiary Legislation and Other Instruments | ||
(to be presented by Hon Andrew LEUNG, Chairman of the House Committee) |
(a) | of the resources and manpower that CPU will deploy in the next five years for monitoring the opinions on public affairs expressed by members of the public on social networking web sites and discussion forums on the Internet; whether it will recruit additional manpower to post comments on these social networking web sites and discussion forums; if it will, of the additional manpower to be recruited;
|
(b) | whether various policy bureaux were previously required to report to CPU's members appointments to the public offices of statutory and advisory bodies; of the total number of candidates for appointment to public offices which have been reported by various policy bureaux since the implementation of the measure, and whether the CPU member concerned has raised objection to any of these candidates; if objections have been raised, whether the candidates concerned have been appointed eventually; and
|
(c) | whether it has assessed if CPU's new function concerning appointments to public offices of statutory and advisory bodies will undermine the power of policy bureaux in appointing members of the community to public offices; if the assessment outcome is in the affirmative, of the details; if the assessment outcome is in the negative, the reasons for that? |
(a) | of the timetable for releasing the remaining sites as well as the areas, locations and specified uses of those sites; among such sites, the number of those which will be used for storing containers and providing logistics back-up services;
|
(b) | given that some members of the logistics industry have told me that apart from the Kwai Tsing area, the authorities will also consider identifying other logistics sites in North West New Territories, of the progress update on such task (including the timetable for releasing the sites as well as the areas and locations of those sites); and
|
(c) | given that the logistics industry has switched to the provision of storage, distribution and transit services for high value goods and these services require a lot of land for the work processes of storing, devanning and consolidating containers, whether the Government will review its current policy on logistics sites and, making reference to the practice of the Government in the last century of constructing factory buildings and industrial estates, provide infrastructural facilities to tie in with the development of the logistics industry, e.g. constructing government warehouses and lease them to small and medium enterprises at cost, so that the development of such enterprises will not be hindered because of inability to afford the high rentals of warehouses built by developers on sites obtained at high bid prices; if it will, of the details of its plan; if not, the reasons for that? |
(a) | according to the current requirements on declaration of interests, whether CE is required to declare the companies set up by his spouse which are directly related to the policies actively promoted by the Government; if such declarations are required, of the details and whether such declarations are available for public inspection; if such declarations are not required, of the reasons for that;
|
(b) | whether it has assessed if it will give rise to perceived or real conflict of interests when on the one hand the Government actively promotes the policy of food waste reduction and, on the other hand, CE's wife has set up a company engaged in food waste treatment; if the assessment result is in the affirmative, of the details; if the assessment result is in the negative, the reasons for that; and
|
(c) | whether the operation of companies by the spouses and immediate family members of CE and politically appointed officials ("PAOs") as well as their acceptance of government subsidies or donations from the business sector through such companies are subject to regulation by existing legislation or codes for CE and PAOs on prevention of conflict of interests; if so, whether it has assessed if the aforesaid case violates the relevant requirements; if such regulation is not in place, whether the Government has considered expanding the scope of the relevant legislation or codes to cover the aforesaid situation to prevent conflict of interests? |
Public Officers to reply | : | Secretary for Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Secretary for the Environment |
(a) | of the details of the sound cannons, including the model, efficacy, lethality, coverage, and potential hazards to human health (including immediate and permanent damages), and whether they will harm people who are not the target;
|
(b) | of the weaponry used by the Police, prior to the procurement of the sound cannons, for handling the situations which are now handled by the sound cannons; whether the Police's procurement of the sound cannons was due to the inadequacies of such weaponry; if there were inadequacies of such weaponry, of the details; whether the Police had other reasons for procuring the sound cannons; whether they have plans to procure more sound cannons; and
|
(c) | how the Police determine what situations are "riots" which call for the use of sound cannons; of the channels through which the public may inspect the Police's codes and guidelines on the use of sound cannons; whether the authorities have consulted healthcare professionals and the Independent Police Complaints Council on the codes; if they have, of the views collected; if not, the reasons for that? |
(a) | of the direction along which the Police are currently investigating the causes of the aforesaid failure, as well as the impact of the failure on the work of frontline police officers;
|
(b) | of the number of cases of system failure (including all incidents) of CC3 that have occurred so far since its coming into operation at the end of 2004, as well as the causes of the failure; and
|
(c) | whether the Police have conducted regular reviews on the effectiveness and security issues, etc., of CC3; if they have, of the frequency of such reviews; if not, the reasons for that? |
(a) | whether non-Hong Kong-based CX employees are required to obtain work visas from the Hong Kong Government for working on flights which stop over in Hong Kong; if not, of the reasons for that;
|
(b) | of any requirement in the regulations for the aviation industry that local airlines licensed by the Air Transport Licensing Authority should accord priority to local workers in filling the posts created by them; and
|
(c) | whether it will take any measures to prevent locally registered airlines from employing non-Hong Kong-based employees to work on flights with Hong Kong as the operation centre, so as to protect local workers' employment opportunities? |
Public Officers to reply | : | Secretary for Transport and Housing Secretary for Labour and Welfare |
(a) | whether it will allow reporters to use the direct access linking the East and West Wings of the new CGC, and open the gate of the West Wing for use by reporters to facilitate their reporting in the new CGC;
|
(b) | whether it will make reference to the relevant arrangements in the former CGO, and allow reporters to go to the staff canteen for meals direct through the access between the West Wing of the new CGC and the canteen;
|
(c) | whether it will open up the ground floor lobby of the CE Office to reporters during the time when there is no ExCo meeting, so as to give reporters the opportunities to interview officials entering or leaving that place during such time, just like the arrangements in the former CGO; and
|
(d) | whether it will require ExCo Members to use the main entrance when they attend ExCo meetings and to cease using the access which is not visible to reporters, so that reporters will have the opportunities to interview ExCo Members and to monitor their attendance at meetings (including whether they are absent from or late for the meeting, or leave the meeting early)? |
(a) | of the number of DNRP women who gave birth in Hong Kong since April this year; how this figure compares with that in the same period last year;
|
(b) | of the number of cases of bogus marriage detected by the authorities since April this year and, among these cases, the number of those which were related to the purpose of giving birth in Hong Kong; the number of cases in which the persons involved were convicted;
|
(c) | given that the aforesaid agents provide "through-train" services (including reservation of hospital beds, accommodation in Hong Kong and application for relevant documents after delivery, etc.) and their modes of operations are varied, whether the authorities have set up a dedicated department to combat the activities of these agents; if they have, of the details and the effectiveness; if not, the reasons for that;
|
(d) | whether the authorities will further step up the relevant administrative measures and impose heavy penalty on DNRP women who come to give birth in Hong Kong; if they will, of the details; whether the authorities will eradicate DNRP women giving birth in Hong Kong through introducing legislation; if they will, of the details; and
|
(e) | given that the authorities have indicated that they would cooperate with the relevant mainland departments and take joint law enforcement actions to combat the activities of those agents, of the details and progress? |
(a) | of the details of the incident of the aforesaid family being detained in Hong Kong and subsequently repatriated to Libya, including the number of Libyans involved, their treatment during their stay in Hong Kong, who were responsible for arranging for their repatriation from Hong Kong and the transportation upon their arrival at the destination, as well as the rank of the government officers in Hong Kong who were responsible for handling the case and the resources involved;
|
(b) | of the justifications for the authorities carrying out the detention and repatriation operations, or on the request of which organizations the authorities had taken such operations; whether such operations were taken in accordance with the established procedures; whether the authorities had, prior to repatriating the aforesaid family, questioned the family members, instituted any judicial proceedings and informed them in writing of the decision of extradition, expulsion or repatriation to Libya;
|
(c) | whether it has assessed the liabilities and rights of and the role played by the authorities in this incident;
|
(d) | whether the authorities, prior to carrying out the repatriation operation, had assessed if the Libyan would be subject to any torture or inhumane treatment after being repatriated to his country, and if such repatriation would contravene the Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment; if they had, of the assessment outcome; if not, the reasons for that; and
|
(e) | whether the authorities will conduct an investigation into this incident; if they will, of the expected time of completion and whether they will make public the investigation report; if no such investigation will be conducted, the reasons for that? |
(a) | of the number of applications for HKSAR passports in the past five years, together with a breakdown by the means of application (in person, by post, putting in drop-in boxes and online);
|
(b) | of the number of cases in the past five years in which the applicants, who originally intended to apply for HKSAR passports through the Internet, had to submit their applications by other means because the digital photographs they submitted had been rejected; and
|
(c) | whether it will improve the programme for accepting online submission of passport photographs in order to increase the success rate of applications for HKSAR passports through the Internet? |
(a) | of the details of the measures and law enforcement actions taken by the Food and Environmental Hygiene Department in respect of the aforesaid problems in the past five years (together with the number of prosecutions instituted);
|
(b) | whether the Police had taken any law enforcement actions under section 4 (Nuisances and miscellaneous offences), section 4A (Obstruction of public places) and section 32 (Removal of filth, etc., and recovery of expenses) of the Summary Offences Ordinance (Cap. 228) in respect of the aforesaid problems in the past five years; if so, of the details; if not, the reasons for that;
|
(c) | whether the Fire Services Department had followed up in the past five years the problem of food premises making arrangements for customers to use naked flame for hot pot meals on road sides; if so, of the details; if not, the reasons for that; and
|
(d) | given that the Office of The Ombudsman issued in this year an investigation report on the complaint against three government departments for failing to curb the unauthorized extension of business area by a hawker stall, of the details of the follow-up actions taken by the said departments in respect of the investigation report? |
(a) | given that section 20(1)(c) of the Pleasure Grounds Regulation (Cap. 132, sub. leg. BC) provides that "[n]o person shall, in any pleasure ground, sell, or offer or expose for sale, or let to hire, or offer or expose for letting to hire, any commodity or article, unless, in pursuance of an agreement with the Director or otherwise in exercise of any lawful right or privilege, such person is authorized to sell or let to hire in such pleasure ground such commodity or article", whether the "commodity or article" referred to in this provision includes fee-charging personal instructions or coaching services;
|
(b) | of the number of cases in which the hirers' rights to use the facilities were revoked due to their contravention of the Pleasure Grounds Regulation in the past three years;
|
(c) | of the measures currently taken by LCSD to prevent hirers from misusing pleasure grounds, and the details;
|
(d) | whether any decoy operations had been carried out in the past three years to detect misuse of pleasure grounds by hirers; if so, of the numbers of such operations and the cases involving contravention of the Regulation; if not, whether it will consider carrying out such operations; and
|
(e) | given that LCSD's current online electronic system for booking leisure facilities by the public is unable to show the whole-day booking situation of individual facilities, whether the authorities will consider enhancing the system to facilitate the public to get information about the time slots available for booking of leisure facilities more easily, so as to increase the utilization rates of facilities? |
(a) | of the number of cases of REEs smuggling detected by the Customs and Excise Department (and the percentage of such number in the total number of cases of smuggling), the quantity and value of the REEs involved (and the percentage of such value in the total value of all smuggling cases), and the number of persons involved in these cases, in each of the past three years;
|
(b) | whether it has assessed if Hong Kong is a major transit point for REEs smuggling; if so, of the reasons for that; whether it has estimated the total quantity of REEs smuggled via Hong Kong last year; and
|
(c) | whether the authorities have faced any difficulties in combating REEs smuggling activities and whether they have collaborated with the Mainland customs in this regard; if there are difficulties, of the details; if they have collaborated with the Mainland customs, of the details; if they have not collaborated, the reasons for that; and how they will step up efforts in combating such smuggling activities? |
(a) | as the Reporting Scheme is not applicable to UBWs in the Kowloon and Hong Kong regions, why BD has not taken law enforcement actions vigorously against the aforesaid UBWs; and
|
(b) | whether the authorities will give this Council and the public a full account on how the Government has handled each of the UBW cases involving CE, politically appointed officials and Unofficial ExCo Members, including whether they have taken law enforcement actions and instituted prosecutions; if they have, when such actions were taken and of the relevant details; if not, the reasons for that; and if no account will be given, the reasons for that? |
(a) | if it has taken an official stance on whether dark pool trading should be prohibited, regulated, or encouraged; if it has, of the details;
|
(b) | whether it knows when SFC will release the outcome and conclusions of the aforesaid consultation exercise; and
|
(c) | whether the authorities will consider introducing legislation to regulate dark pool trading with a view to increasing its transparency, preserving the integrity of the local stock market and giving better protection to retail investors; if they will, of the legislative timetable, and whether they will conduct a separate public consultation on the proposed legislation? |
(a) | with regard to the recommendations made by the Working Group which were adopted by the Government, whether the authorities have regularly reviewed the effectiveness of the efforts made by the relevant government departments in implementing such recommendations; if so, of the review results;
|
(b) | with regard to the recommendations made by the Working Group which were not adopted by the Government, whether the authorities have taken any measures to address the relevant concerns raised by the Working Group; if so, of the details and effectiveness of such measures; and
|
(c) | given that the report of the Working Group was completed more than a decade ago, since then the Internet has become more and more popular and the relevant information technology has made rapid development, whether the authorities have any plans to set up an inter-departmental working group again to conduct a comprehensive review of the framework within which law enforcement against computer crimes may be carried out and the environment in which personal data and privacy on the Internet are protected; if so, of the work schedule; if not, the reasons for that? |
(a) | of the details of the overseas duty visits conducted by various politically appointed officials since the inauguration of the incumbent Government (including the dates, purposes, destinations, itineraries, numbers and ranks of accompanying staff as well as the amounts of expenditure incurred); and
|
(b) | since some members of the public have relayed to me their concern that as certain politically appointed officials have conducted quite a number of overseas duty visits since their assumption of offices, they may have neglected their work in Hong Kong, whether the Government will comprehensively review the guidelines regarding overseas duty visits by politically appointed officials, so as to ensure that they conduct overseas visits only when necessary; if it will, of the details; if not, the reasons for that? |
(a) | of the latest progress of the authorities' efforts in promoting free early childhood education; the progress in setting up the working group under the Education Commission; the authorities' initial proposal on the method and approach for implementing free early childhood education; the anticipated difficulties and technical problems which may be encountered; how they will improve the remuneration packages for kindergarten teachers and provide a stable environment for their development, so as to ensure that there will be well-qualified teaching staff to tie in with the implementation of free early childhood education; and the transitional arrangements and timetable for implementing free early childhood education; and
|
(b) | whether, apart from students enrolled in undergraduate programmes, the number of students enrolled in other post-secondary programmes (e.g. sub-degree programmes) have been taken into account in calculating the current university cohort participation rate; if so, of a breakdown by type of programmes; of the specific methods to be used by the authorities to increase the university cohort participation rate in Hong Kong and the scope concerned; the respective percentages of first-year first-degree places and senior year articulation places provided for sub-degree holders in the number of additional subsidized places; whether the authorities will set a target for increasing the percentage of local students enrolling in subsidized undergraduate programmes; whether the authorities will conduct a review to see if measures to increase university places will give rise to or exacerbate problems of over-enrolment of students and variations in quality among some of the sub-degree programmes and self-financing post-secondary programmes, and how they will step up regulation to prevent such problems? |
(a) | whether it knows the numbers of complaints received in the past 12 months by the former OFTA/OFCA and the Consumer Council respectively, which involved overcharging by TSOs and the names of TSOs in substantiated cases, broken down by type of telecommunications services (e.g. fixed-line phones, mobile phones, external telecommunications and broadband Internet access, etc.) and nature of the complaints;
|
(b) | whether it knows, among the cases in (a), the number of those in which the complainants succeeded in getting compensation, as well as the names of TSOs which were prosecuted and the number of times such TSOs had been prosecuted; and
|
(c) | apart from continuing to implement the existing measures to regulate TSOs, whether the authorities will adopt new regulatory measures to better protect consumers' interests; if they will, of the details; if not, the reasons for that? |
(a) | whether the Government will consider the aforesaid suggestion to exempt those eligible Hong Kong-registered companies from paying BSD; if it will, of the details; if not, the reasons for that;
|
(b) | as the Government has indicated that the aforesaid measure is "an extraordinary measure introduced under exceptional circumstances" and it will consider cancelling the measure after "the demand-supply situation of the property market has regained its balance", whether the Government has specific criteria for evaluating if the property market has reached the state in which "the demand-supply situation has regained its balance"; if it has, of the details; if not, the reasons for that;
|
(c) | how the Government determined that BSD should be set at the level of 15% of the prices of properties;
|
(d) | as the information of the Land Registry shows that there were 71 012 residential property transactions in the first 10 months of 2012, whether the Government has assessed the impact of BSD on the number of transactions and prices of residential properties; if it has, of the details; if not, the reasons for that;
|
(e) | whether it has, prior to introducing BSD, assessed how this duty will affect the number of cases of foreign investors making investments in Hong Kong; if it has, of the details; if not, the reasons for that;
|
(f) | as the Government expects that the aforesaid measures will enable the residential property market to "accord priority to meeting the housing needs of HKPRs", whether the Government has assessed the number of HKPRs who will be benefited from the implementation of BSD and acquire residential properties; if it has, of the details; if not, the reasons for that;
|
(g) | whether the Government has considered exempting charities, non-profit-making organizations and public organizations from paying BSD for acquisition of residential properties; if it has, of the details; if not, the reasons for that;
|
(h) | as the Government has indicated that it has arranged to meet with the consuls of various countries in Hong Kong, the Law Society of Hong Kong, the Real Estate Developers' Association of Hong Kong, the Estate Agents Authority, the estate agency trade, as well as local and foreign chambers of commerce, etc. to brief them on the new measures, of a name list of the persons whom the Government has met, together with the dates of the meetings; if it cannot provide such information, the reasons for that; whether those persons have expressed support for the Government's implementation of BSD; if they have, of the details; if not, the reasons for that;
|
(i) | whether it has assessed the impact of BSD on the employment and income of estate agents and staff in the mortgage departments of banks; if it has, of the details; if not, the reasons for that; and
|
(j) | as the Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury indicated in the reply to a Member's question at the Legislative Council meeting of 14 November this year that the Hong Kong Monetary Authority ("HKMA") was aware that more funds may flow to the purchase of vehicle parking spaces or non-residential properties after the introduction of BSD, and HKMA would thus give "reminders" to banks, and the banks would also take measures to offer loans under stringent loan-to-value ratios to those investing in vehicle parking spaces so that the overall macroscopic risks might be lowered, whether the Government has assessed if this remark will cause banks to tighten up their vetting and approval of mortgage applications for residential properties; if it has, of the details; if not, the reasons for that? |
1. | Proposed resolution under the Criminal Procedure Ordinance The Chief Secretary for Administration to move the following motion: Resolved that the Criminal Procedure (Witnesses' Allowances) (Amendment) Rules 2012, made by the Criminal Procedure Rules Committee on 26 October 2012, be approved. |
(The Rules are in Appendix I and were also issued on 9 November 2012 under LC Paper No. CB(3)129/12-13) | |
2. | Proposed resolution under the Coroners Ordinance The Chief Secretary for Administration to move the following motion: Resolved that the Coroners (Witnesses' Allowances) (Amendment) Rules 2012, made by the Chief Justice on 25 October 2012, be approved. |
(The Rules are in Appendix II and were also issued on 9 November 2012 under LC Paper No. CB(3)130/12-13) |