A 12/13-37
Subsidiary Legislation / Instruments | L.N. No. | |
---|---|---|
1. | Waterworks (Amendment) Regulation 2013 | 121/2013 |
2. | Designation of Libraries (Amendment) (No. 4) Order 2013 | 122/2013 |
1. | No. 115 | - | Clothing Industry Training Authority Annual Report 2012 |
(to be presented by Secretary for Labour and Welfare) | |||
2. | No. 116 | - | Sir Robert Black Trust Fund Report of the Trustee on the Administration of the Fund and financial statements for the year ended 31 March 2013 |
(to be presented by Secretary for Home Affairs) | |||
3. | Committee on Rules of Procedure Progress Report for the period October 2012 to July 2013 | ||
(to be presented by Hon TAM Yiu-chung, Chairman of the Committee, who will address the Council) | |||
4. | Report No. 21/12-13 of the House Committee on Consideration of Subsidiary Legislation and Other Instruments | ||
(to be presented by Hon Andrew LEUNG, Chairman of the House Committee) | |||
3. | Report of the Bills Committee on Trust Law (Amendment) Bill 2013 | ||
(to be presented by Hon NG Leung-sing, Chairman of the Bills Committee) | |||
3. | Report of the Bills Committee on Pesticides (Amendment) Bill 2013 | ||
(to be presented by Hon SIN Chung-kai, Chairman of the Bills Committee) | |||
7. | Report of the Panel on Food Safety and Environmental Hygiene 2012-2013 | ||
(to be presented by Hon Alan LEONG, Chairman of the Panel, who will address the Council) | |||
8. | Report of the Panel on Information Technology and Broadcasting 2012-2013 | ||
(to be presented by Hon WONG Yuk-man, Chairman of the Panel, who will address the Council) | |||
9. | Report of the Panel on Manpower 2012-2013 | ||
(to be presented by Hon LEE Cheuk-yan, Chairman of the Panel, who will address the Council) | |||
10. | Report of the Panel on Development 2012-2013 | ||
(to be presented by Dr Hon LAU Wong-fat, Chairman of the Panel, who will address the Council) | |||
11. | Report of the Panel on Commerce and Industry 2012-2013 | ||
(to be presented by Hon Vincent FANG, Chairman of the Panel, who will address the Council) | |||
12. | Report of the Panel on Public Service 2012-2013 | ||
(to be presented by Hon Mrs Regina IP, Chairman of the Panel, who will address the Council) | |||
13. | Report of the Panel on Education 2012-2013 | ||
(to be presented by Dr Hon LAM Tai-fai, Chairman of the Panel, who will address the Council) | |||
14. | Report of the Panel on Housing 2012-2013 | ||
(to be presented by Hon WONG Kwok-hing, Chairman of the Panel, who will address the Council) | |||
15. | Report of the Panel on Welfare Services 2012-2013 | ||
(to be presented by Hon CHAN Yuen-han, Chairman of the Panel, who will address the Council) | |||
16. | Report of the Panel on Environmental Affairs 2012-2013 | ||
(to be presented by Hon Cyd HO, Chairman of the Panel, who will address the Council) | |||
17. | Report of the Panel on Transport 2012-2013 | ||
(to be presented by Hon CHAN Kam-lam, Chairman of the Panel, who will address the Council) |
(a) | of the details of the programmes for assisting the N have-nots, including the target recipients of assistance, amount of subsidies and implementation date;
|
(b) | given that some N have-nots, including those low-income persons living in sub-divisions of a flat (commonly known as "sub-divided units") and illegal rooftop structures of industrial buildings, cannot benefit from the "Subsidy for low-income persons who are inadequately housed" programme launched under CCF last year, whether the authorities will consider including them in the scope of assistance in the new round of assistance programmes; if they will, of the details; if not, the reasons for that; and
|
(c) | whether it will consider providing recurrent funding on an annual basis, so that those programmes for assisting the N have-nots can be implemented as regular measures; if it will, of the details; if not, the reasons for that? |
(a) | whether it has assessed the social values and effects to be brought about by converting the former residence of Bruce Lee into a permanent memorial hall, as well as the public aspirations for realization of such a proposal; if it has, of the conclusion; if not, the reasons for that;
|
(b) | despite that the authorities had announced two years ago the temporary shelving of the negotiation with the owner of the former residence of Bruce Lee on the conversion of the premises into a Bruce Lee memorial hall, as the press has reported that the owner is still eager to donate that property and hopes for the early establishment of a Bruce Lee memorial hall, whether the authorities will proactively reconsider various possible ways and means to implement the proposal of converting the former residence of Bruce Lee into a Bruce Lee memorial hall; and
|
(c) | as quite a number of members of the public consider that Mr Bruce Lee is a symbol of Hong Kong, of the form, contents and vehicle to be adopted by the Government to convey and pass on the Hong Kong spirit displayed by Mr Lee following the activities organized in commemoration of him this year; if concrete proposals are not available, whether it will actively study the issue and put forth proposals in this regard? |
Public Officers to reply | : | Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development Secretary for Home Affairs |
(a) | of the respective numbers, as projected by the authorities, of graduates of subsidized and self-financing undergraduate and sub-degree programmes in each year from 2015 to 2018, with a breakdown by their major subjects;
|
(b) | of the total number, as projected by the authorities, of the job vacancies available for application by graduates of post-secondary programmes in each year from 2015 to 2018, with a breakdown by type; whether they have assessed if the total number of such vacancies, and its breakdown by type, will be commensurate with the number of job seekers; and
|
(c) | given that two batches of secondary school graduates from the new and the old academic structures for senior secondary education respectively had been admitted last year to the Bachelor of Laws Degree programmes and they will be graduating in the same year, whether the authorities have assessed the impact of such a situation on these students' opportunities for admission to the Postgraduate Certificate in Laws courses after graduation, securing employment thereafter as trainee solicitors or seeking pupillage as barristers, and pursuing a career in the legal profession? |
(a) | given that the Convenor of the Non-official Members of the Executive Council has recently expressed that a growing number of people who care about politics hope that the Government will expeditiously roll out the public consultation on constitutional reform because people will feel that the Government is procrastinating if it keeps on repeating that it will conduct public consultation at "a suitable time" and their patience is wearing out, why the authorities have not, after a long time, put forward a proposal on constitutional reform for public consultation; and
|
(b) | whether the consultation paper on constitutional reform will include, apart from electoral arrangements, other important issues of constitutional reform, such as amending the law to abolish the stipulation that the Chief Executive ("CE") must not be a member of any political party, so that CE may form a ruling coalition with the major political party (parties) in the Legislative Council ("LegCo") for sharing power and responsibilities, as well as for joint governance of the Special Administrative Region, so that CE no longer has to rely on the current "one-off approach" in seeking the support from various political parties in LegCo for each and every issue; whether they have studied if it will contravene the Basic Law and the spirit of "one country, two systems" for the Government to be headed by a political party (parties); if they have conducted such a study, of the details; if not, the reasons for that? |
(a) | of the progress of the discussions on QDII2 between the relevant authorities of Hong Kong and the Mainland; whether it knows the specific contents, vetting and approving progress as well as the implementation timetable of the trial scheme;
|
(b) | whether it has assessed the business opportunities that will be brought to local securities dealers after the implementation of QDII2; how the authorities will ensure that small and medium securities dealers can engage in the business concerned; and
|
(c) | of the progress of the work undertaken by the authorities to facilitate local securities dealers to develop business on the Mainland; how the authorities will expand the room of operation for local securities dealers on the Mainland, so that the scope of their business will not be restricted to investment advisory business; and whether the authorities will seek approval from the mainland authorities for local securities dealers to operate wholly-owned business on the Mainland to provide securities related services? |
(a) | whether it has heard the demand made by the people during the march for the Chief Executive to step down; if it has, whether it will follow up; whether the authorities have assessed the number of people taking to the street which will make such a demand realized;
|
(b) | of the number of police officers deployed by the Police on the day of the 1 July march to count the number of participants, how the counting was conducted, and how the number of participants was arrived at (including whether only those participants setting off from the Victoria Park had been counted); whether the participants who joined the march midway had been counted; if so, of the respective numbers of participants who joined the march in Tin Hau, Causeway Bay, Wan Chai, Admiralty and Central, and the boundary lines for each of these districts; and
|
(c) | whether the current training for police officers includes the counting of the number of participants in marches; of the rank of the police officer who decides to release to the media the number of participants in a march as estimated by the Police, and the legislation based on which such a number is released; whether the authorities have a mechanism in place to impose severe punishment on police officers for releasing to the media a wrong estimate of the number of participants in a march? |
(a) | of the number of complaints or reports received by FSD in each of the past three years; the current procedure of FSD for handling complaints and reports, and whether verification of the identities of the complainants and informants as well as the relevant matters are included in such procedure; if so, of the details; if not, the reasons for that;
|
(b) | of the number of complaints or reports received by FSD through emails in each of the past three years, as well as the fire safety problems and types of buildings mainly involved in such complaints and reports; how FSD verified the contents of such complaints and reports;
|
(c) | of the number of inspections carried out in each of the past three years by FSD arising from the complaints or reports received, the effectiveness of such inspections and, among such inspections, the number of prosecutions instituted;
|
(d) | of the specific procedures followed by FSD from receipt of a complaint to the making of a decision to conduct an inspection; whether FSD will notify the occupier of the relevant premises before deploying officers to inspect such premises, and whether FSD will conduct such an inspection without affecting the occupier; if not, of the reasons for that; and
|
(e) | whether FSD has put in place a mechanism for penalizing those people who make false reports or abuse the complaint mechanism; if it has, of the details; if not, the reasons for that? |
(a) | of the numbers of Members with dual membership in the current term and the past three terms of LegCo (set out in the table below);
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(b) | of the situations of Members with dual membership being absent from full meetings of the two Councils from 1 October last year to 30 June this year:
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(i) | of the highest number of times of absence from LegCo meetings among the LegCo Members returned by geographical constituencies ("GCs"), and the absence rate of the Member concerned;
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(ii) | of the highest number of times of absence from LegCo meetings among the LegCo Members returned by functional constituencies ("FCs") and the absence rate of the Member concerned;
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(iii) | of the highest number of times of absence from DC meetings among the LegCo Members returned by GCs and the absence rate of the Member concerned; and
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(iv) | of the highest number of times of absence from DC meetings among the LegCo Members returned by FCs and the absence rate of the Member concerned;
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(c) | whether the authorities have conducted studies and surveys on the difficulties encountered by Members with dual membership when performing the duties of the two Councils, so as to understand their situations and collect their views; if they have, of the details; if not, whether they will expeditiously conduct such studies and surveys with a view to making improvements;
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(d) | given that currently LegCo Members returned by the two FCs of DC must be DC members and that the meeting schedules of LegCo and DC frequently clash, whether the authorities have assessed the impacts of such a situation on the operations of the two Councils; if they have, of the details; if not, the reasons for that; and
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(e) | given that Members returned by the DC (Second) FC (commonly known as "super DC members") not only need to attend to both the businesses of LegCo and DC, but also need to serve over three million voters who do not have voting right in other FCs, whether the authorities will, in the long run, review the functions of, the difficulties faced by and the resources issues for Members of this FC, so as to provide more support for Members of this FC in future? |
(a) | whether the authorities have assessed, before rolling out the Energy Saving Charter, the impact of the light rays emitted from CFLs on the health conditions of photosensitive patients (e.g. patients suffering from Lupus Erythematosus); whether, after the sale of ILBs has completely stopped, safe lighting products will be available on the market for these patients to choose; if so, of the details; if not, the reasons for that;
|
(b) | apart from disposing of spent CFLs from government departments at the Chemical Waste Treatment Centre in Tsing Yi and encouraging the relevant recycling activities, what specific measures the authorities have put in place to properly dispose of spent CFLs, so as to prevent the toxic substances released by spent CFLs from causing harm to the health of the public and cleaners; and
|
(c) | how the authorities will promote and educate the public on the correct use of CFLs and the risks involved, and how they will teach the public the safe way to clean up broken CFLs safely? |
(a) | whether it knows the number of elderly people returning from various provinces on the Mainland to Hong Kong for resettlement in each of the past three years, as well as the respective percentages of such numbers in the total number of Hong Kong elderly people who had moved to and settled on the Mainland;
|
(b) | among the elderly people who had returned to Hong Kong from the Mainland for resettlement in the past three years, of the number of those who had sought assistance from SWD after returning to Hong Kong, such as applying for Comprehensive Social Security Assistance and for admission to subsidized RCHEs, together with a breakdown by type of assistance sought;
|
(c) | whether the authorities have analysed the reasons for Hong Kong elderly people returning from the Mainland for resettlement in Hong Kong, and assessed the impact of their return to resettle in Hong Kong on the demand for social welfare services in Hong Kong; if they have, of the details; if not, the reasons for that;
|
(d) | given that there are quite a number of RCHEs on the Mainland at present which are operated by non-governmental organizations in Hong Kong for accommodating elderly people from Hong Kong, but their occupancy rates have persistently remained on the low side, whether the authorities have considered including such RCHEs in the Enhanced Bought Place Scheme, with a view to, on the one hand, providing more choices to the elderly people waiting for admission to subsidized RCHEs and, on the other, providing services to those Hong Kong elderly people who have moved to and settled on the Mainland; and
|
(e) | given that Hong Kong elderly people who have moved to and settled on the Mainland are entitled to neither the medical benefits and social services on the Mainland nor certain social welfare benefits in Hong Kong, whether the authorities will expeditiously study the feasibility of providing OALA to elderly people residing in Guangdong and, in the long run, consider providing such elderly people with the social welfare benefits enjoyed by local elderly people, such as elderly health care vouchers and community care service vouchers for the elderly; if they will, of the relevant study and timetable? |
(a) | of the number of UO households with elderly members aged between 60 and 69, together with a breakdown by housing estate;
|
(b) | whether HA will hold the new arrangements in abeyance temporarily and conduct consultation on such arrangements; if it will not, of the reasons for that;
|
(c) | whether it has assessed if the new arrangements, which will force the elderly aged between 60 and 69 to move out of their residence where they have lived for many years, have violated the elderly-care principle of ageing in place; if the assessment result is in the negative, of the justifications for that;
|
(d) | whether the authorities have considered what difficulties UO households with elderly members aged between 60 and 69 will encounter with the transfer; how the authorities will help them overcome such difficulties, including whether these households will be exempted from the transfer; if they will, of the criteria adopted; if not, the reasons for that; and
|
(e) | whether the authorities will consult PRH residents before further tightening the thresholds for Prioritized UO households in future; if they will, of the consultation procedures; if not, the reasons for that? |
(a) | given that some residents have pointed out that the train frequency of WRL during night-time cannot meet the demand, resulting in passengers at the intermediate stations often finding it difficult to board the first arriving train heading towards Tuen Mun, the respective starting and ending time of the peak and off-peak hours for train services of WRL; the average patronage and the carrying capacity of the trains of various time slots;
|
(b) | given that the trains of WRL currently run at a frequency of approximately six to seven minutes during off-peak hours, whether the MTR Corporation Limited ("MTRCL") will increase the train frequency of that time slot; if MTRCL will not, the circumstances under which the train frequency will be increased;
|
(c) | given that some residents have relayed that the demand for train services in districts along WRL continues to rise, whether MTRCL will consider increasing the number of train cars of WRL from seven to nine which is the original design standard; if MTRCL will not, the circumstances under which the number of train cars will be increased;
|
(d) | the respective starting and ending time of the peak and off-peak hours for services of various LR routes at present; the average patronage and the carrying capacity of the trains of various time slots; the details of operating various LR routes with single-carriage or two-carriage trains;
|
(e) | as the new fare table issued by MTRCL shows that starting from 30 June this year, the Single Journey fares are lower than their corresponding Octopus fares for more than 1 300 fare combinations of LR, with differences ranging from $0.1 to $0.5, the causes for such differences; whether there is any solution and its implementation timetable; and
|
(f) | as LR is the main mode of transport providing connection for passengers of WRL to and from various locations in North West New Territories, but the last train-departure time of certain LR routes cannot cater for the needs of passengers of the last train of WRL, the details of these LR routes and the causes for this situation; whether MTRCL will consider extending the service hours of the relevant routes? |
(a) | of the actual expenditure of the improvement works for Mong Kok Stadium; whether, when vetting and approving the works design for the reconstruction of spectator stands and the provision of covers at the Stadium, the authorities had assessed if the aforesaid problems would occur; if they had, of the details; if not, the reasons for that; and
|
(b) | whether the authorities have received complaints or enquiries from members of the public regarding the aforesaid problems; if they have, of the details of the replies made by the authorities to the complainants, and how they will follow up and remedy such situation; if no remedies will be made, of the reasons for that? |
(a) | of the differences between the Governments of the current and the last terms in relation to climate change strategy and action agenda; the latest emission reduction target for carbon dioxide; whether the Government plans to launch the public consultation afresh in this regard; if not, whether it will expeditiously announce the ultimate proposals on the strategy and action agenda;
|
(b) | whether it has assessed the impact of the long absence of any strategy devised by the authorities with regard to the fuel mix for electricity generation, on the reduction target set by the Government of the last term (i.e. the reduction in carbon intensity by 50% to 60% by 2020 as compared with the level in 2005), and whether the Government of the current term will adjust the emission reduction target for carbon dioxide in view of such impact; and
|
(c) | whether the Government of the current term will adopt the promotion of energy efficiency and the increase in the use of renewable energy as the major strategies for emission reduction (including a substantial increase in the proportion of renewable energy in the fuel mix for electricity generation, the introduction of demand side management on electricity consumption, etc.), and whether it will set a cap on the total amount of greenhouse gas emission, so as to replace the proposal of the Government of the last term to use carbon intensity as an emission reduction indicator; if it will not, of the reasons for that? |
(a) | whether the authorities have conducted tests to check if the levels of sulphur dioxide, nitrogen oxides and respirable suspended particulates in the dark smoke emitted by the cargo vessels sailing through the said area exceed the relevant standards, and whether the authorities have assessed the impact of the dark smoke on the health of the residents nearby; if they have, of the results and measures to mitigate the problem of air pollution in the area;
|
(b) | whether the authorities have assessed the effectiveness of the port facilities and light dues incentive scheme since its implementation last year in encouraging ocean-going vessels to switch to low-sulphur diesel oil from residual oil while berthing in Hong Kong waters ("fuel switch at berth"); of the expected time when public consultation on the implementation of mandatory fuel switch at berth will be conducted;
|
(c) | of the progress made by the authorities in exploring the feasibility of implementing fuel switch at berth in the Pearl River Delta ("PRD") waters with the relevant authorities of Guangdong, Shenzhen and Macao; whether any difficulties have been encountered; if so, of the reasons for that;
|
(d) | apart from the plan to install on-shore electricity supply in the Kai Tak Cruise Terminal, whether it has any plans to install such facilities in other cruise terminals; if it does not have such plans, of the reasons for that;
|
(e) | whether the authorities have set up any project group to follow up the feasibility of establishing an Emission Control Area ("ECA") in PRD waters; if they have, of the progress, including whether they have discussed the issue with the relevant authorities of Guangdong, Shenzhen and Macao, and the data on the estimated reduction in emissions of pollutants; if they have discussed the issue, of the details, and the cities or regions which have undertaken to establish an ECA and the timetable for establishing ECA; if not, whether any difficulties have been encountered, and of those difficulties;
|
(f) | whether the authorities will consider exploring, in collaboration with the authorities of the regions adjacent to the eastern waters of Hong Kong (including Daya Bay), the establishment of an ECA in those waters; if they will, of the details; if not, the reasons for that; and
|
(g) | whether the authorities will conduct public consultation on the plan to establish ECA; if they will, of the details; if not, the reasons for that? |
(a) | of the contents of the aforesaid letters, and whether such letters were issued pursuant to the Broadcasting Ordinance (Cap. 562) and established licensing procedure;
|
(b) | whether the Government has modified the policy of not setting an upper limit on the number of TV licences; if so, of the justifications for that; if not, why it intends to issue the licences selectively;
|
(c) | of the factors the Chief Executive in Council takes into consideration at the present stage for screening those applicants who may be granted the licences, and the procedure for making such decision; and
|
(d) | whether the Government currently has any plan to postpone the vetting and approval of the present three applications for new TV licences until such time when the existing licences expire, so as to handle these applications together with the applications for renewal of licences; if it has, of the reasons for that; if not, the Government's latest timetable for vetting and approval of the applications for new licences? |
(a) | of the total amount of bonds issued in the bond market of Hong Kong in the past 10 years;
| ||||||||||||||||||
(b) | of the issuance of bonds by the Government and public organizations in the past 10 years (set out in the table below);
| ||||||||||||||||||
(c) | whether the authorities have conducted any assessment on and set any target for the progress of development of the local bond market; if they have, of the details; if not, the reasons for that;
| ||||||||||||||||||
(d) | apart from issuing inflation-linked retail bonds and developing the Islamic Bond market in Hong Kong, how the Government will further promote the development of the local bond market, including the retail bond market; given that some organizations have proposed that the Government should encourage public organizations such as the MTR Corporation Limited and the Airport Authority to issue bonds for financing various infrastructure projects, so as to increase the types and quantities of bonds issued, whether the authorities have studied and taken forward such proposal; if so, of the details; and
| ||||||||||||||||||
(e) | given that some organizations have proposed that the Government should expand the trading platform for local bonds, e.g. developing an electronic bond trading platform by making use of e-Cert certification services, so as to increase the turnover and facilitate the popularization of the bond market, whether the authorities have studied and taken forward such proposal; if so, of the details? |
(a) | of the respective numbers of complaints received, Nuisance Notices issued and prosecutions instituted by the authorities in each of the past 10 years about water dripping from air-conditioners;
|
(b) | of the normal time gap between the receipt of a complaint and a site inspection conducted by the authorities; given that most complaints were lodged by members of the public who found water dripping from air-conditioners after they had returned home from work at night-time, whether the authorities will deploy staff to conduct investigations at night-time; if they will not, how the authorities adduce relevant evidence, as well as investigate and verify whether the complaints are substantiated;
|
(c) | whether the authorities will deploy staff to carry out surprise inspections at individual black spots of water dripping from air-conditioners; if they will, of the details; if not, the reasons for that; when no improvement has been made to the problem of water dripping at those black spots, of the way in which the authorities will tackle the problem;
|
(d) | whether the authorities will consider accepting other means of adducing evidence to expedite the procedure for handling complaints about water dripping from air-conditioners (e.g. using the video images provided by building management offices or the complainants); if they will, of the details; if not, the reasons for that; and
|
(e) | given that under the Public Health and Municipal Services Ordinance (Cap. 132), any person who fails to comply with the requirements of a Nuisance Notice within the period specified therein is guilty of an offence and liable to a maximum fine of $10,000 and a daily fine of $200, of the number of days normally given by the authorities to a complainee to make the necessary improvements; regarding complaint cases in which the requirements of such notices have not been complied with within the specified period, how members of the public can lodge follow-up complaints? |
(a) | whether the authorities have drawn up a specific work plan and timetable for installing a general AQMS in Tseung Kwan O; if they have, of the relevant details and the latest progress of implementation; if not, when the authorities will draw up and announce the relevant plan and timetable; if the authorities have not yet decided on the formulation of such a plan and timetable, of the reasons for that; when the general AQMS under construction in Tuen Mun will come into operation;
|
(b) | as the authorities indicated in reply to the questions asked by the Members of this Council on 6 January 2010 and 4 July 2012 respectively that "we consider it unnecessary to set up an AQMS in each of the 18 districts at present" and "the current monitoring network can adequately reflect the level of air quality in Hong Kong ...... At present, we have no plan to increase the number of AQMSs", and the Director of Audit pointed out in his report published in October 2012 that as there was rapid development and population growth in Tseung Kwan O, a general AQMS was proposed to be installed in the district, and the Environmental Protection Department has supported the proposal and commenced a preliminary site search for the purpose, of the reasons and justifications for the authorities to change their policy;
|
(c) | as I have learnt that the authorities had proposed the setting up of a general AQMS in Tseung Kwan O as one of the compensational measures when they tried to persuade the residents of the district to agree to the proposal for extending the Southeast New Territories Landfill ("the extension project"), and the authorities have withdrawn the funding application for the extension project, whether the authorities will adjust or even withdraw the plan to set up the general AQMS; if they will, of the details; if a decision on whether to set up a general AQMS is made independent of the extension project, whether the authorities have assessed if regarding this proposal as a compensational measure in the course of persuading the residents is misleading;
|
(d) | whether the authorities will conduct a comprehensive review of the number and spatial distribution of monitoring stations to ascertain the need to set up general and roadside AQMSs in more areas; if they will, of the details of the review; if not, the reasons for that;
|
(e) | whether, in planning for the number, type, distribution and specific location of AQMSs, the authorities have made decisions on the basis of an objective and quantifiable set of standards; if they do, of the details of such standards; if not, the conditions and criteria based on which the authorities make decisions; and
|
(f) | whether the authorities will consider conducting policy research and public consultation on improving the air quality monitoring system in order to gather public opinions on the matter, especially those of the residents in the districts concerned and green groups; if they will, of the details; if not, the reasons for that? |
(a) | whether it knows the following information on each type of the aforesaid surgeries and treatments performed by public hospitals on their patients in the past three years: (i) the number of patients receiving the surgeries/treatments, (ii) the average unit cost and (iii) the average waiting time;
|
(b) | whether it knows the following information on the 20 types of most frequently performed surgeries in public hospitals in the past three years: (i) the number of patients receiving the surgeries, (ii) the average unit cost and (iii) the average waiting time (broken down by surgery type);
|
(c) | whether it knows the following information on the 10 types of surgeries with the longest waiting time among those performed by public hospitals on their patients in the past three years: (i) the number of patients receiving the surgeries, (ii) the average unit cost and (iii) the average waiting time (broken down by surgery type); and
|
(d) | whether it has assessed the approximate length of time for which the $50 billion, set aside from the fiscal reserves for the implementation of the healthcare reform, can support the operation of HRP; if it has, of the details; if not, the reasons for that; whether the authorities will impose a cap on the amount of co-payment for each subscriber in HRP; if they will, of the details; if not, the reasons for that? |
(a) | given CE's clear commitment above, why the Government now intends to progressively phase out the recurrent subvention for the mainstream primary and secondary schools of ESF starting in the 2016-2017 school year;
|
(b) | of the Government's policy on the provision of subsidized school places for the children of English-speaking Hong Kong permanent residents, who have not been admitted to the local mainstream schools which use Chinese as the main medium of instruction; and
|
(c) | of a list of those local schools that have confirmed that they are willing and able to offer places to English speaking students who will no longer be able to afford ESF school fees once the subvention is withdrawn? |
(a) | whether it has sought information from the relevant departments of the Shenzhen Municipal Government about the aforesaid press report; if it has, of the details; if not, the reasons for that;
|
(b) | of a breakdown, by place of origin, of the shellfish sold in Hong Kong in terms of quantities and percentages;
|
(c) | whether the authorities have obtained the relevant information on the aquaculture farms in those waters in Hong Kong and nearby regions which are more seriously contaminated and contain a higher concentration of heavy metals, so as to step up the sampling tests conducted on the seafood supplied by such aquaculture farms and to take precautionary measures; if they have, of the details; if not, the reasons for that;
|
(d) | whether the authorities have assessed if the existing work of conducting sampling tests are sufficient to ensure that the seafood sold in local markets meet the relevant food safety standards; if they have, of the details; if not, the reasons for that;
|
(e) | whether it has assessed the proportion of seafood imported through illegal channels or without sampling tests conducted among all seafood sold in local markets; if so, of the details, together with a comparison between the present situation and that of five years ago; if not, the reasons for that; and
|
(f) | apart from the food safety report released monthly by the Centre for Food Safety, whether the relevant government departments will make public the results of sampling tests conducted on seafood samples without delay; if they will, of the details; if not, the reasons for that? |
First Reading | |||
1. | Child Abduction Legislation (Miscellaneous Amendments) Bill 2013 | ||
2. | Toys and Children's Products Safety (Amendment) Bill 2013 | ||
Second Reading (Debates to be adjourned) | |||
1. | Child Abduction Legislation (Miscellaneous Amendments) Bill 2013 | : | Secretary for Labour and Welfare |
2. | Toys and Children's Products Safety (Amendment) Bill 2013 | : | Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development |
Second Reading (Debates to resume), Committee Stage and Third Reading | |||
1. | Trust Law (Amendment) Bill 2013 | : | Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury |
Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury
to move Committee stage amendments (The amendments were issued on 9 July 2013 under LC Paper No. CB(3) 807/12-13) | |||
2. | Pesticides (Amendment) Bill 2013 | : | Secretary for Food and Health |
Secretary for Food and Health to move Committee stage amendments (The amendments were issued on 11 July 2013 under LC Paper No. CB(3) 820/12-13) |
1. | Proposed resolution under section 34(2) of the Interpretation and General Clauses Ordinance
Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury to move the motion in Appendix I. |
(The motion was also issued on 15 July 2013
under LC Paper No. CB(3) 838/12-13) | |
2. | Proposed resolution under section 34(2) of the Interpretation and General Clauses Ordinance
Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury to move the motion in Appendix II. |
(The motion was also issued on 15 July 2013
under LC Paper No. CB(3) 838/12-13) | |
3. | Proposed resolution under section 34(2) of the Interpretation and General Clauses Ordinance
Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury to move the motion in Appendix III. |
(The motion was also issued on 15 July 2013
under LC Paper No. CB(3) 838/12-13) | |
4. | Proposed resolution under the Companies Ordinance
Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury to move the following motion: Resolved that the Companies (Unfair Prejudice Petitions) Proceedings Rules, made by the Chief Justice on 9 May 2013, be approved. |
(The Rules are in Appendix IV and were also issued
on 3 July 2013 under LC Paper No. CB(3) 757/12-13) | |
5. | Proposed resolution under the Mandatory Provident Fund Schemes Ordinance
Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury to move the following motion: Resolved that the Mandatory Provident Fund Schemes Ordinance (Amendment of Schedule 2) Notice 2013, made by the Chief Executive in Council on 28 May 2013, be approved. |
(The Notice is in Appendix V and was also issued
on 3 July 2013 under LC Paper No. CB(3) 758/12-13) | |
6. | Proposed resolution under the Mandatory Provident Fund Schemes Ordinance
Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury to move the following motion: Resolved that the Mandatory Provident Fund Schemes Ordinance (Amendment of Schedule 3) Notice 2013, made by the Chief Executive in Council on 28 May 2013, be approved. |
(The Notice is in Appendix VI and was also issued
on 3 July 2013 under LC Paper No. CB(3) 758/12-13) |