A 13/14-30
(1) | the respective numbers of full-time or part-time Diploma of Vocational Education ("DVE") and Higher Diploma ("HD") programmes offered by VTC in the academic years between 2008-2009 and 2012-2013, and in respect of such programmes, (i) the academic disciplines, (ii) the entry requirements, (iii) the durations of study, (iv) the numbers of places offered, (v) the numbers of students enrolled and (vi) the numbers of graduates, and set out a breakdown, by programme title and academic year, in tables of the same format as the table below;
Academic year : ______________ Level of study : DVE/HD
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(2) | the criteria adopted by VTC for determining the ratio of the number of DVE programmes to that of HD programmes; and
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(3) | whether VTC will consider running more part-time programmes; if it will, of the details; if not, the reasons for that? |
(1) | given that it has been recently reported that Hong Kong's top three retailers of ivory have ceased selling ivory products, and that the Government has commenced phased destruction of confiscated ivory by incineration since May 2014 to demonstrate its determination to curb illicit trade in ivory, whether the Government will consider imposing a comprehensive ban on all ivory sales in Hong Kong; if it will not, of the reasons for that;
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
(2) | whether AFCD will consider implementing a registration system for ivory items held in private collections, which makes use of carbon dating technology to ascertain the age of such items; if it will not, of the reasons for that;
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
(3) | whether AFCD will consider making public a list of holders of ivory licences, and stating on the application forms for such licences that the personal information entered thereon may be used for such purpose; if it will not, of the reasons for that;
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
(4) | of the following statistics on Hong Kong's legal ivory trade in each of the past five years (set out in the table below); if there is no such information, the reasons for that; and
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
(i) | the number of ivory licence holders;
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
(ii) | the quantity of raw and worked ivory legally held as inventory by ivory licence holders (in tonnes); and
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
(iii) | the quantity of raw and worked ivory leaving the inventory of ivory licence holders (in tonnes);
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
(5) | given the strong demand for ivory products on the Mainland and the surge in mainland visitor arrivals to Hong Kong in recent years, whether the Government knows if the rate of depletion of the inventory of raw and worked ivory held by ivory licence holders accelerated in the past 10 years correspondingly; if the rate did not accelerate, whether it has assessed the reasons for that? |
(1) | of the policy bureau/government department which is responsible for monitoring the operation of the escalator system, and the design capacity as well as the current actual loading of the system; whether it has assessed the loading of the system during periods of repairs and maintenance, and whether such loading has exceeded the design capacity; if it has assessed, of the outcome and the improvement measures in place; if not, whether it will conduct such an assessment immediately;
|
(2) | of the number of occasions, in each of the past three years, on which the escalator system was partly or wholly shut down due to malfunctioning of the system, and the repair and maintenance costs of the system;
|
(3) | whether it has plans to upgrade the escalator system (including the air-conditioning system and standard of its mechanical parts) to reduce the frequencies of system failures and service suspensions for repair works; if so, of the details, as well as the estimated costs for the related works, and the time needed; if not, the reasons for that;
|
(4) | how the Government will resolve the conflicts between the two aforesaid departments on the staircase project, and which department will be assigned to be responsible for the project and of the expected time for commencement of the works; and
|
(5) | as the Transport Department ("TD") has indicated in its reply to KTDC on the 8th of last month that there is no need to implement the proposed staircase project because its estimated utilization rate is not high, but the residents of Ping Tin Estate and Yau Lai Estate hold contrary views, of the statistics and justifications based on which TD has given such a view, and whether TD has consulted the residents of the two districts and the District Council members concerned; if so, of the results; if not, the reasons for that, and whether it will conduct such a consultation immediately? |
(1) | how the authorities determined the types of housing estates participating in the pilot scheme and the scale of the pilot scheme;
|
(2) | how the authorities recruited and selected the participating housing estates;
|
(3) | how the authorities publicize and promote the pilot scheme to the residents of the relevant housing estates at present;
|
(4) | of the operational details of the pilot scheme, including the respective dates on which the pilot scheme will start and cease to be implemented in various housing estates;
|
(5) | given that the pilot scheme adopts only a mock waste charge for the trial run, and the residents concerned are not required to pay any charge based on the volume of waste they dispose of, whether the authorities have assessed how the results of the pilot scheme can reflect residents' behavioural pattern when the municipal solid waste charging is implemented in future; and
|
(6) | given that the pilot scheme covers only multi-storey residential buildings, whether the authorities will implement pilot schemes on municipal solid waste charging in other types of buildings (e.g. commercial/residential buildings, commercial buildings, industrial buildings and village houses); if they will, of the details? |
(1) | of the number of temporary structures erected on construction sites for use by personnel of government departments as well as the expenditure so incurred in each of the past five years, with a breakdown by the names of departments;
|
(2) | of the number of such temporary structures demolished and quantity of construction waste (in tonne) so generated in each of the past five years; and
|
(3) | whether there are any policies or guidelines currently in place that require or encourage government departments to use recyclable building materials as far as possible for the erection of such temporary structures; if so, of the details, and whether it has monitored the implementation of such policies and guidelines by the government departments concerned; if there is no policy or guideline, whether the authorities will consider formulating the relevant policies or guidelines? |
(1) | of the specific timetable for studying the implementation of the recommendations made in the aforesaid report, and when it will report to the Panel on Constitutional Affairs of this Council on the progress of such work; whether it will consult the stakeholders (including universities and the media) on the relevant matters; if it will not, of the reasons for that;
|
(2) | whether it will implement the aforesaid nine improvement measures before LRC completes the aforesaid comparative study; if it will, of the details; if not, the reasons for that;
|
(3) | among the requests for information made in writing received by various policy bureaux/government departments ("B/Ds") in the past three years, of the respective numbers of those requests made without citing the contents of the Code and those made without using the application form contained in the Code; and
|
(4) | whether it has plans to increase the transparency of the ATI regime, such as improving the web site contents of the Code, and regularly publishing in digital format the data on the requests for information received by various B/Ds; if it has such plans, of the details? |
(1) | whether SFC compiled statistics, broken down by the capital background of the brokers, on (i) the number and percentage of Category C brokers recording a profit and (ii) the number and percentage of Category C brokers recording a loss, in each of the past three years; if SFC did, set out the statistics in tables of the same format as the table below;
Year: ________
| |||||||||||||||
(2) | the types of income included in the item "Other income" in Table 2 of the Review; and
| |||||||||||||||
(3) | whether SFC will amend the definition of Category C brokers or create a new category in order to reflect more accurately the actual business conditions of small and medium brokers? |
(1) | the details of HA's adjustment to "the statistical delineation of the geographical populations" of various Clusters;
| ||||||||||||||||
(2) | the specific method for calculating "the actual numbers of patients served" by various Clusters; whether patients who used services provided by more than one Cluster were counted separately in the "actual numbers of patients served" by the Clusters concerned;
| ||||||||||||||||
(3) | the actual numbers of patients served by various Clusters in each year from 2006-2007 to 2013-2014 after "the statistical delineation of the geographical populations" was adjusted and, among such patients, the percentage of those aged 65 or above (set out in tables of the same format as Table 1 below); and
Table 1: Year___________
| ||||||||||||||||
(4) | the following data of each Cluster in each year from 2006-2007 to 2013-2014 after "the statistical delineation of the geographical populations" was adjusted (set out in tables of the same format as Table 2 below):
| ||||||||||||||||
(i) | the population of the catchment area;
| ||||||||||||||||
(ii) | the percentage of people aged 65 or above in the population of the catchment area;
| ||||||||||||||||
(iii) | the number of patients in the catchment area;
| ||||||||||||||||
(iv) | the percentage of patients aged 65 or above in the number of patients in the catchment area;
| ||||||||||||||||
(v) | among the population of the catchment area, the percentage of those people who used the general and the specialist outpatient services provided by the Cluster;
| ||||||||||||||||
(vi) | the average median monthly income of the households in the catchment area; and
| ||||||||||||||||
(vii) | among the population of the catchment area, the number and percentage of the people from those households with an average monthly income less than half of the median monthly household income of all domestic households in Hong Kong? |
Cluster | (i) | (ii) | (iii) | (iv) | (v) | (vi) | (vii) |
HKEC | |||||||
HKWC | |||||||
... | |||||||
Overall |
(1) | whether the Police have, in response to the recent discussions on constitutional development and the social atmosphere, conducted a new round of assessment of Occupy Central; if they have assessed, of the outcome, including the police manpower needed to be deployed for Occupy Central, the impacts of the deployment on the police manpower of other police districts, as well as the impacts of Occupy Central on the traffic and the economy, etc.; if they have not, the reasons for that;
|
(2) | as it has been reported that the Police recently issued an internal circular requiring all police officers to cancel their leave during the period from 22 June to 5 July this year and make themselves ready for deployment when necessary, whether this arrangement is one of the plans that the authorities have worked out in preparation for Occupy Central; if so, of the specific arrangements of the plan; and
|
(3) | as it has been reported that some organizations have indicated that they may occupy or encircle some landmark locations in Hong Kong, including the Legislative Council Complex, the Central Government Offices, and the building of the Liaison Office of the Central People's Government in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, of the corresponding measures the authorities will adopt, including how they will work in coordination with the personnel responsible for the management of such locations? |
(1) | whether it has compiled statistics on the number of singletons with disabilities who are currently living in accommodations with appalling conditions (including cubicle apartments, sub-divided units, bedspaces, and so on), together with a breakdown by type of disabilities and accommodations;
|
(2) | of the number of persons with disabilities among the applicants under QPS in each of the past five years;
|
(3) | of the number of singletons with disabilities who were recommended in each of the past five years by the Social Welfare Department for compassionate rehousing and, among them, of the respective numbers of those whose applications for compassionate rehousing were approved and rejected by the Housing Department; and
|
(4) | whether it will, by drawing reference from the Priority Scheme, implement measures to shorten the waiting time for allocation of PRH to singletons with disabilities; if it will, of the details; if not, the reasons for that? |
(1) | of the respective numbers of public bicycle parking spaces in various District Council ("DC") districts in New Territories East at present;
|
(2) | whether it assessed in the past three years the supply and demand situation of parking spaces for bicycles in various DC districts in New Territories East; if it did, of the assessment outcome; if not, the reasons for that;
|
(3) | of the number of abandoned bicycles removed by the authorities from public bicycle parking areas in New Territories East in each quarter of the past three years, with a tabulated breakdown by DC district;
|
(4) | whether it has assessed the actual effectiveness of the aforesaid double-deck bicycle parking racks; if it has, of the assessment outcome; if not, the reason for that; and
|
(5) | whether the authorities, apart from providing double-deck parking racks, have any new initiative to tackle the problem of insufficient parking spaces for bicycles; if they have, of the details; if not, the reason for that? |
(1) | of the number of cases of students smuggling goods detected by the Customs and Excise Department at the various immigration control points ("control points") in the past three years, and the number of such cases in which prosecutions were instituted against the persons concerned, with a breakdown by age of students, category of goods and control point concerned; as the current minimum age of criminal responsibility is 10 years of age, how the authorities deal with cases of smuggling goods by students who are below the age of 10, and whether they will consider holding the parents and guardians of such students, as well as the escorts who escort such students to cross the boundary, criminally liable; if they will, of the details;
|
(2) | of the measures currently put in place by the Customs and Excise Department to combat smuggling activities conducted by engagement of students;
|
(3) | whether it knows the number of cases of students smuggling goods detected by the mainland customs at the various ports in the past three years, and the number of such cases in which prosecutions were instituted against the persons concerned, with a breakdown by age of students, category of goods and the port concerned; if such information is not available, of the reasons for that, and whether it will seek such information from the mainland customs;
|
(4) | whether it has communicated and discussed with the mainland customs the making of concerted efforts to combat the smuggling activities of students; if it has, of the details; if not, the reasons for that; and
|
(5) | as it has been reported that the mainland customs require the escorts of students to sign an undertaking to abide by the law, whether it knows the content of such an undertaking, and the penalties meted out by the mainland customs on those escorts who engage students in smuggling activities? |
(1) | among the 128 post offices across the territory, of the respective numbers of those operating at a profit and those operating at a loss in 2012-2013, as well as the amount of profit/loss made by each post office; whether the authorities established any new post office and closed down loss-making one in the past five years; if they did, of the details and numbers; whether the authorities have analysed in detail the reasons for individual post offices incurring substantial loss; whether there is any plan in the coming year to close down post offices operating at a substantial loss; if there is such a plan, of the details; if not, the reasons for that;
|
(2) | whether the authorities have assessed in detail the current financial position (including sustainability) of the trading fund and the quality of postal services; if they have, of the outcome; if not, the reasons for that; of the business development plan and measures that the HKP will adopt in the coming year to reduce or reverse the operating loss, in order to avoid affecting the quality of postal services; and
|
(3) | whether the authorities have any plan to develop new businesses in the coming year, e.g. re-examining the feasibility of providing deposit and withdrawal services at post offices, in order to increase the sources of revenue and enhance business performance; if they have such a plan, whether the authorities have studied how the new businesses will affect the efficiency of postal services; if they have studied, of the details; if not, the reasons for that? |
(1) | targeting at the aforesaid problems faced by Hong Kong as pointed out by the Report, of the authorities' new plans and measures in respect of talents, industry development and taxation, so as to enhance the competitiveness of Hong Kong;
|
(2) | whether it has explored the causes of Zhuhai overtaking Hong Kong to become the most livable city in China; if it has, of the outcome, and whether it will take corresponding measures to maintain Hong Kong's ranking in livable cities of China or even enable Hong Kong to regain the top ranking; if it has not explored the causes, the reasons for that; and
|
(3) | whether it has conducted any analysis and assessment as to whether the Report's comment that Hong Kong "lacks strength to accelerate and sustain growth" is fair, as well as whether the Report has delivered a warning on the decline in Hong Kong's overall competitiveness and economic development; if it has conducted such an analysis and assessment, of the details and outcome, as well as the corresponding measures and follow-up actions; if it has not conducted any analysis and assessment, the reasons for that, and whether it will conduct the relevant analysis and assessment? |
(1) | given that an archaeological survey conducted in 2010 in the Sacred Hill Area revealed that the area covered by the SCL works had certain archaeological potential, whether it knows if the MTR Corporation Limited ("MTRCL") had conducted any related site investigation and formulated contingency measures before the commencement of the SCL works; if MTRCL had, of the details; if not, the reasons for that;
|
(2) | as it has been reported that the delay in the completion of the SCL works may lead to the loss of public money up to $1 million each day, whether the authorities have discussed with MTRCL any proposal to expedite completion of the works so as to reduce the loss of public money and make the railway service available to the public as early as possible; if they have, of the details; if not, the reasons for that;
|
(3) | whether it knows if MTRCL had, before the commencement of the SCL works, explained to the shop operators concerned the possible impacts of the works on them to facilitate them to make corresponding arrangements early; if MTRCL had, of the details; if not, the reasons for that;
|
(4) | whether it knows the number and the outcome of cases of claims filed with MTRCL by shop operators whose businesses have been affected by the SCL works, as well as the number of rejected cases among them and the reasons for rejection; if the relevant information is not available, of the reasons for that; and
|
(5) | given that some shop operators have relayed to me that the claims handling mechanism of MTRCL is very complicated, whether the authorities have assisted those operators whose businesses have been affected by the SCL works in filing claims against MTRCL; if they have, of the details; if not, the reasons for that? |
(1) | whether it knows the number of Hong Kong people living in Shanghai at present and, among them, the respective numbers of students studying at kindergartens, primary schools and secondary schools;
|
(2) | given that since 2008, the Education Bureau and the Shenzhen Municipal Education Bureau have jointly implemented, in Shenzhen for the Hong Kong children there, the scheme under which schools/classes are set up to provide learning programmes mainly following the Hong Kong curriculum ("the Scheme") and eligible primary six students who study at such schools/classes may join the "Hong Kong Secondary School Places Allocation System" for allocation of subsidized secondary one places of schools in Hong Kong, whether the Government has plans to extend, in collaboration with the mainland authorities, the Scheme to other mainland cities with a relatively high population of Hong Kong people; if it has such a plan, of the details; if not, the reasons for that; and
|
(3) | whether it has looked into the provision of financial incentives (such as tax concessions) to encourage Hong Kong private school sponsoring bodies to establish schools on the Mainland for Hong Kong children, so as to offer such Hong Kong children one more option for education; if it has, of the details; if not, the reasons for that? |
Committee Stage and Third Reading
| |||
Appropriation Bill 2014 | : | The Financial Secretary | |
Amendments to heads of estimates in Committee of the whole Council on the Appropriation Bill 2014 | |||
Hon Albert CHAN, Hon LEUNG Kwok-hung, Hon CHAN Chi-chuen, Hon Claudia MO, Hon WONG Yuk-man, Hon SIN Chung-kai, Hon James TO, Dr Hon Helena WONG, Hon Gary FAN, Hon WU Chi-wai, Hon LEE Cheuk-yan, Dr Hon Fernando CHEUNG, Hon CHEUNG Kwok-che and Hon Cyd HO to move the Committee stage amendments in the Appendix.
| |||
(These amendments were also issued on 17, 24 and 30 April 2014 under LC Paper Nos. CB(3)566/13-14, CB(3)573/13-14 and CB(3)602/13-14 respectively) | |||
(Debate and voting arrangements for Committee stage amendments to the Appropriation Bill 2014 (updated version issued on 5 May 2014 under LC Paper No. CB(3) 615/13-14(01))
| |||
Other Public Officers to attend the Committee stage | : | The Chief Secretary for Administration The Secretary for Justice Secretary for Transport and Housing Secretary for Home Affairs Secretary for Labour and Welfare Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development Secretary for Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Secretary for Security Secretary for Education Secretary for the Civil Service Secretary for Food and Health Secretary for the Environment Secretary for Development Under Secretary for Home Affairs Under Secretary for the Environment Under Secretary for Transport and Housing Under Secretary for Security Under Secretary for Food and Health Under Secretary for Education Under Secretary for Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Under Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development Under Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury Under Secretary for Development | |
Second Reading (Debate to resume), Committee Stage and Third Reading | |||
Dutiable Commodities (Amendment) Bill 2014 | : | Secretary for Food and Health |
Item Number | Title of Subsidiary Legislation or Instrument |
(3) | Rating (Exemption) Order 2014 (L.N. 26/2014). |
First Reading
Kowloon Tong Church of the Chinese Christian and Missionary Alliance Incorporation (Amendment) Bill 2014 Second Reading (Debate to be adjourned) | |||
Kowloon Tong Church of the Chinese Christian and Missionary Alliance Incorporation (Amendment) Bill 2014 | : | Dr Hon Priscilla LEUNG
|