A 19/20-8

Legislative Council

Agenda

Wednesday 27 November 2019 at 11:00 am

I.
Papers to be laid on the Table of the Council

3 items of subsidiary legislation/instruments and 7 other papers to be laid on the Table of the Council set out in Appendix 1

II.
Questions

Members to ask 22 questions (6 for oral replies and 16 for written replies)
Questions for oral replies to be asked by
Public officers to reply
1.
Secretary for the Civil Service
2.
Secretary for Transport and Housing
3.
Secretary for Security
4.
Hon IP Kin-yuen
Secretary for Security
5.
Secretary for Security
6.
Secretary for Security
Contents of 22 questions, Members to ask such questions and public officers to reply set out in Appendix 2

III.
Government Bills

First Reading and Second Reading (debate to be adjourned)
1.
Copyright (Amendment) Bill 2019
(Standing over from the meeting of 13 November 2019)
:
Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development
2.
:
Secretary for Transport and Housing
Consideration by committee of the whole Council and Third Reading
3.
Judicial Officers (Extension of Retirement Age) (Amendment) Bill 2019
(Standing over from the meeting of 10 July 2019)
:
Chief Secretary for Administration
Second Reading (debate to resume), consideration by committee of the whole Council and Third Reading
4.
Electoral Legislation (Miscellaneous Amendments) Bill 2019
(Standing over from the meeting of 10 July 2019)
:
Secretary for Constitutional and Mainland Affairs
Secretary for Constitutional and Mainland Affairs to move an amendment as set out in LC Paper No. CB(3) 13/19-20 issued on 9 October 2019

IV.
Government Motions

1st debate (to deal with the following 2 motions)
(Standing over from the meeting of 10 July 2019)
1.
Proposed resolution under Article 73(7) of the Basic Law and section 7A of the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal Ordinance (Cap. 484) on appointment of a judge
Mover
:
Chief Secretary for Administration
Wording of the motion
:
2.
Proposed resolution under Article 73(7) of the Basic Law on appointment of a judge
Mover
:
Chief Secretary for Administration
Wording of the motion
:
(Debate and voting arrangements set out in LC Paper Nos. CB(3) 760/18-19 and CB(3) 55/19-20 issued on 27 June and 21 October 2019)

V.
Members' Motions on Subsidiary Legislation/Instruments

1st debate (to deal with the following motion)
1.
Proposed resolution to extend the period for amending subsidiary legislation
Mover
:
Hon Steven HO
Wording of the motion
:
2nd debate (to deal with the following motion)
2.
Proposed resolution to extend the period for amending subsidiary legislation
Mover
:
Hon Frankie YICK
Wording of the motion
:
3rd debate (to deal with the following motion)
3.
Proposed resolution to extend the period for amending subsidiary legislation
Mover
:
Ir Dr Hon LO Wai-kwok
Wording of the motion
:
4th debate (to deal with the following motion)
4.
Proposed resolution to extend the period for amending instrument
Mover
:
Hon Elizabeth QUAT
Wording of the motion
:

VI.
Member's Bill

First Reading and Second Reading (debate to be adjourned)
1.
St. John's College (Amendment) Bill 2019
(Standing over from the meeting of 10 July 2019)
:
Hon Jimmy NG

VII.
Members' Motions (not including those on Subsidiary Legislation/Instruments)

1st debate (to deal with the following motion)
(Standing over from the meeting of 10 July 2019)
1.
Motion under Article 73(9) of the Basic Law to form an independent investigation committee to investigate the charges against the Chief Executive for serious breach of law and/or dereliction of duty
Mover
:
Hon Alvin YEUNG
Wording of the motion
:
(This motion jointly initiated by 25 Members: Hon Alvin YEUNG, Hon James TO, Hon LEUNG Yiu-chung, Prof Hon Joseph LEE, Hon Claudia MO, Hon WU Chi-wai, Hon Charles Peter MOK, Hon CHAN Chi-chuen, Hon Kenneth LEUNG, Dr Hon KWOK Ka-ki, Hon Dennis KWOK, Dr Hon Fernando CHEUNG, Dr Hon Helena WONG, Hon IP Kin-yuen, Hon Andrew WAN, Hon CHU Hoi-dick, Hon LAM Cheuk-ting, Hon SHIU Ka-chun, Hon Tanya CHAN, Hon HUI Chi-fung, Dr Hon CHENG Chung-tai, Hon KWONG Chun-yu, Hon Jeremy TAM, Hon Gary FAN and Hon AU Nok-hin)
Public officer to attend
:
Chief Secretary for Administration
2nd debate (to deal with the following motion)
(Standing over from the meeting of 20 November 2019)
2.
Motion under Rule 49B(1) of the Rules of Procedure to relieve Hon Tanya CHAN of her duties as a Member of the Legislative Council
Mover
:
Hon WONG Ting-kwong
Wording of the motion
:
3rd debate (to deal with the following motion)
(Standing over from the meeting of 20 November 2019)
3.
Motion under Rule 49B(1) of the Rules of Procedure to relieve Hon SHIU Ka-chun of his duties as a Member of the Legislative Council
Mover
:
Hon WONG Kwok-kin
Wording of the motion
:
4th debate (to deal with the following motion)
(Standing over from the meeting of 23 October 2019)
4.
Motion under Rule 49B(1A) of the Rules of Procedure to censure Hon Junius HO
Mover
:
Dr Hon KWOK Ka-ki
Wording of the motion
:
(This motion jointly signed by Hon Alvin YEUNG, Hon Tanya CHAN and Hon Jeremy TAM)
5th debate (to deal with the following motion)
(Standing over from the meeting of 30 October 2019)
5.
Motion under Rule 49B(1A) of the Rules of Procedure to censure Hon Junius HO
Mover
:
Hon Claudia MO
Wording of the motion
:
(This motion jointly signed by Hon CHU Hoi-dick, Hon CHAN Chi-chuen and Hon Gary FAN)
6th debate (to deal with the following motion)
(Standing over from the meeting of 6 November 2019)
6.
Motion under Rule 49B(1A) of the Rules of Procedure to censure Dr Hon CHENG Chung-tai
Mover
:
Hon YUNG Hoi-yan
Wording of the motion
:
(This motion jointly signed by Hon Mrs Regina IP, Hon WONG Ting-kwong and Hon POON Siu-ping)
7th debate (to deal with the following motion)
(Standing over from the meeting of 20 November 2019)
7.
Motion under Rule 49B(1A) of the Rules of Procedure to censure Hon LAM Cheuk-ting
Mover
:
Hon Junius HO
Wording of the motion
:
(This motion jointly signed by Hon YUNG Hoi-yan, Hon YIU Si-wing and Hon POON Siu-ping)
8th debate (to deal with the following motion)
(Standing over from the meeting of 12 June 2019)
8.
Motion under Article 73(5) and (10) of the Basic Law to summon persons concerned to produce papers and testify
Mover
:
Hon Dennis KWOK
Wording of the motion
:
Public officer to attend
:
Chief Secretary for Administration
9th debate (to deal with the following 2 motions)
(Standing over from the meeting of 10 July 2019)
9.
Motion under Article 73(5) and (10) of the Basic Law to summon a person to produce papers and testify
Mover
:
Dr Hon KWOK Ka-ki
Wording of the motion
:
10.
Motion under the Legislative Council (Powers and Privileges) Ordinance to appoint a select committee to conduct an inquiry
Mover
:
Hon AU Nok-hin
Wording of the motion
:
Public officers to attend items 9 and 10
:
Secretary for Security
Under Secretary for Security
(Debate and voting arrangements set out in LC Paper No. CB(3) 771/18-19 issued on 27 June 2019)
Debate arrangements for the following 3 motions to be notified
(Order of debates may be adjusted having regard to the debate arrangements to be made)
(Standing over from the meeting of 23 October 2019)
Motions under Article 73(5) and (10) of the Basic Law to summon persons concerned to produce papers and testify
11.
Mover
:
Hon Alvin YEUNG
Wording of the motion
:
Public officers to attend
:
Secretary for Security
Secretary for Transport and Housing
Under Secretary for Security
Under Secretary for Transport and Housing
12.
Mover
:
Dr Hon KWOK Ka-ki
Wording of the motion
:
Public officers to attend
:
Secretary for Security
Secretary for Food and Health
Under Secretary for Security
Under Secretary for Food and Health
13.
Mover
:
Dr Hon Fernando CHEUNG
Wording of the motion
:
Public officers to attend
:
Secretary for Labour and Welfare
Secretary for Security
Under Secretary for Security
Under Secretary for Labour and Welfare
10th debate (to deal with the following motion)
(Standing over from the meeting of 13 November 2019)
14.
Motion under Article 73(5) and (10) of the Basic Law to summon persons concerned to produce papers and testify
Mover
:
Dr Hon KWOK Ka-ki
Wording of the motion
:
Public officers to attend
:
Secretary for Security
Under Secretary for Security
11th debate (to deal with the following 2 motions)
(Standing over from the meeting of 3 July 2019)
Motions under the Legislative Council (Powers and Privileges) Ordinance to appoint select committees to conduct inquiries
15.
Mover
:
Hon Andrew WAN
Wording of the motion
:
16.
Mover
:
Hon Jeremy TAM
Wording of the motion
:
Public officers to attend items 15 and 16
:
Secretary for Security
Under Secretary for Security
(Debate and voting arrangements set out in LC Paper No. CB(3) 723/18-19 issued on 19 June 2019)
Debate arrangements for the following 7 motions to be notified
(Order of debates may be adjusted having regard to the debate arrangements to be made)
(Standing over from the meeting of 23 October 2019)
Motions under the Legislative Council (Powers and Privileges) Ordinance to appoint select committees to conduct inquiries
17.
Mover
:
Hon Claudia MO
Wording of the motion
:
18 and 19.
Mover
:
Hon Tanya CHAN
Wording of the motions
:
20 and 21.
Mover
:
Dr Hon KWOK Ka-ki
Wording of the motions
:
22.
Mover
:
Hon LAM Cheuk-ting
Wording of the motion
:
23.
Mover
:
Hon KWONG Chun-yu
Wording of the motion
:
Public officers to attend items 17 to 23
:
Secretary for Security
Under Secretary for Security
12th debate (to deal with the following motion)
(Standing over from the meeting of 30 October 2019)
24.
Motion under the Legislative Council (Powers and Privileges) Ordinance to appoint a select committee to conduct an inquiry
Mover
:
Hon Gary FAN
Wording of the motion
:
Public officers to attend
:
Secretary for Security
Under Secretary for Security
13th debate (to deal with the following motion)
(Standing over from the meeting of 13 November 2019)
25.
Motion under the Legislative Council (Powers and Privileges) Ordinance to appoint a select committee to conduct an inquiry
Mover
:
Hon CHUNG Kwok-pan
Wording of the motion
:
Public officer to attend
:
Chief Secretary for Administration
14th debate (to deal with the following motion)
26.
Motion under the Legislative Council (Powers and Privileges) Ordinance to appoint a select committee to conduct an inquiry
Mover
:
Dr Hon Priscilla LEUNG
Wording of the motion
:
Amendment mover
:
Hon James TO
(Amendment set out in LC Paper No. CB(3) 155/19-20 issued on 22 November 2019)
Public officer to attend
:
To be advised by the Administration
15th debate (to deal with the following motion)
(Standing over from the meeting of 12 June 2019)
27.
Motion on "No confidence in the Fifth Term Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region"
Mover
:
Hon Dennis KWOK
Wording of the motion
:
Amendment mover
:
Hon Claudia MO
(Amendment set out in LC Paper No. CB(3) 667/18-19 issued on 5 June 2019)
Public officer to attend
:
Chief Secretary for Administration
16th debate (to deal with the following motion)
(Standing over from the meeting of 12 June 2019)
28.
Motion on "Ensuring children's right to play for them to grow up happily"
Mover
:
Hon HO Kai-ming
Wording of the motion
:
5 amendment movers
:
Hon IP Kin-yuen, Dr Hon KWOK Ka-ki, Dr Hon Fernando CHEUNG, Dr Hon CHIANG Lai-wan and Hon HUI Chi-fung
(Amendments set out in LC Paper No. CB(3) 669/18-19 issued on 6 June 2019)
Public officers to attend
:
Secretary for Labour and Welfare
Under Secretary for Labour and Welfare



Clerk to the Legislative Council





Appendix 1

Council meeting of 27 November 2019

Papers to be laid on the Table of the Council

Subsidiary legislation/instruments
Legal Notice No.
Other papers
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Accounts of the Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region for the year ended 31 March 2019
(to be presented by Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury)
10.





Appendix 2

22 questions to be asked at the Council meeting of 27 November 2019

Subject matters
Public officers to reply
Questions for oral replies
1
Hon Mrs Regina IP
Secretary for the Civil Service
2
Hon KWOK Wai-keung
Secretary for Transport and Housing
3
Dr Hon Pierre CHAN
Secretary for Security
4
Hon IP Kin-yuen
Secretary for Security
5
Hon James TO
Secretary for Security
6
Dr Hon KWOK Ka-ki
Secretary for Security
Questions for written replies
7
Hon WONG Ting-kwong
Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development
8
Hon Martin LIAO
Secretary for Transport and Housing
9
Hon SHIU Ka-fai
Secretary for Food and Health
10
Hon LEUNG Yiu-chung
Secretary for Security
11
Hon Kenneth LEUNG
Secretary for the Environment
12
Hon Tony TSE
Secretary for Home Affairs
13
Hon Gary FAN
Secretary for Security
14
Hon WU Chi-wai
Secretary for Security
15
Prof Hon Joseph LEE
Secretary for Security
16
Dr Hon Fernando CHEUNG
Secretary for Security
17
Dr Hon CHIANG Lai-wan
Secretary for Development
18
Hon Dennis KWOK
Secretary for Security
19
Hon Kenneth LAU
Secretary for the Environment
20
Hon Holden CHOW
Secretary for the Civil Service
21
Hon Jimmy NG
Secretary for Transport and Housing
22
Hon HUI Chi-fung
Secretary for Security





Question 1
(For oral reply)

(Translation)

Civil Servants to swear to uphold the Basic Law and swear allegiance to Hong Kong

Hon Mrs Regina IP to ask:
At its meeting on 4 November this year, the Panel on Public Service of this Council passed a motion moved by me, urging the Chief Executive ("CE") to issue an executive order under Article 48(4) of the Basic Law to require all civil servants to swear to uphold the Basic Law and swear allegiance to the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China ("HKSAR"). In this connection, will the Government inform this Council whether CE will exercise the executive powers conferred on her by Article 48(4) of the Basic Law, and formulate a policy and issue an executive order with reference to the Oaths and Declarations Ordinance to require all civil servants (including new appointees) to swear to uphold the Basic Law and swear allegiance to the HKSAR, so as to ensure that civil servants of all ranks and grades will work in solidarity towards common goals, and safeguard the core values of "one country, two systems", "Hong Kong people administering Hong Kong" and a high degree of autonomy?





Question 2
(For oral reply)

(Translation)

Risks involved in the acquisition of residential properties

Hon KWOK Wai-keung to ask:
Recently, quite a number of purchasers of first-hand residential properties have failed to complete their property transactions due to various reasons (e.g. changing home purchase decisions or failing to obtain mortgage loans from financial institutions). As a result, they had to bear losses amounting to several hundred thousand dollars at the least. According to the Residential Properties (First-hand Sales) Ordinance, if a purchaser does not execute an agreement for sale and purchase in respect of the property concerned with the vendor within five working days after entering into a preliminary agreement for sale and purchase ("the cooling-off period"), the transaction is forthwith cancelled and the vendor may forfeit the preliminary deposit which is equivalent to 5% of the purchase price ("the deposit rate"). In this connection, will the Government inform this Council:
(1)
as the Consumer Council recommended in its Study Report on the Sales of First-hand Residential Properties published in 2014 that the cooling-off period be lengthened to between 7 and 14 working days and the deposit rate be lowered to between 1% and 3%, whether the Government has followed up those recommendations, such as conducting studies and public consultations; if so, of the details; if not, the reasons for that;
(2)
whether it will introduce legislative amendments to lengthen the cooling-off period and lower the deposit rate; if so, of the implementation timetable; if not, the reasons for that; and
(3)
of the new measures to step up its efforts in drawing consumers' attention to the various risks associated with the acquisition of properties?





Question 3
(For oral reply)

(Translation)

Complaints against police officers

Dr Hon Pierre CHAN to ask:
There have been ongoing demonstrations since June this year. Conflicts and frictions between the Police and members of the public as well as media workers have occurred from time to time. In this connection, will the Government inform this Council:
(1)
of the number of complaints against police officers received by the Complaints Against Police Office ("CAPO") since June this year; among such complaints, the number of those about police officers violating the Police General Orders by inflicting sexual violence (including sexual insult, indecent assault, sexual harassment and rape) on demonstrators, with a tabulated breakdown by the gender and age group to which the victims belonged and by the rank of the police officers under complaint; the number of such cases which are under investigation;
(2)
of the number of complaints received by CAPO since June this year about police officers refusing to produce their warrant cards and not displaying their police identification numbers on their uniforms, thereby making it difficult for the members of the public to identify them; the Police's improvement measures; and
(3)
of the number of persons since June this year who were injured during the period from their arrest to their arrival at the hospitals; whether such persons have lodged complaints against the Police for delaying their treatment; if so, of the number of complaints received?





Question 4
(For oral reply)

(Translation)

Water cannon vehicles

Hon IP Kin-yuen to ask:
The "anti-extradition to China" movement, which was triggered by the Government forcefully pushing the proposals to amend the law concerning surrender of fugitive offenders, has been going on for nearly six months. It has been reported that when the Police deployed specialized crowd management vehicles (commonly known as "water cannon vehicles") to disperse the crowd by spraying colourless or coloured pepper based solution, there were from time to time innocent people being hit by the sprayed water. In this connection, will the Government inform this Council:
(1)
whether, when the Police deployed a water cannon vehicle to disperse the crowd in Tsim Sha Tsui on the 20th of last month, the target of attack of the water cannon vehicle was the 10-odd people (comprising a Member of this Council, journalists, members of the ethnic minorities and other members of the public) outside the entrance of the Kowloon Mosque, or the Kowloon Mosque, and the justifications for choosing such target of attack; why coloured pepper based solution was chosen for use on that day; whether the police officers concerned operated the water cannon vehicle on that day in accordance with the relevant guidelines; if they did, why some innocent people were hit by the coloured water; if not, whether the Police will institute disciplinary proceedings against the police officers concerned;
(2)
given that on the night of the 11th of this month, a staff member of a pharmacy who had, out of anger about the goods of the pharmacy having been sprayed wet by a water cannon vehicle, thrown goods at that water cannon vehicle, was subsequently attacked with pepper balls and arrested by the Police, of the reasons why the Police sprayed pepper based solution at the pharmacy; whether it knows if the said staff member was injured; if he was, of the injuries he sustained; of the Police's specific measures to ensure that religious venues, shops, vehicles, journalists, and passers-by not involved in demonstrations will not be endangered when water cannon vehicles are deployed in future; the ways by which members of the public whose bodies or properties have been wrongfully hit by the water sprayed from a water cannon vehicle may claim compensations; and
(3)
given that when the Police dispersed the crowd outside The Hong Kong Polytechnic University on the 17th of this month, a water cannon vehicle sprayed water at the direction of some journalists, hitting a journalist who then fell onto the ground, suffered from shock and underwent an operation immediately necessitated by skull fracture and cerebral haemorrhage, of the reasons why the water cannon vehicle sprayed water at the direction of the journalists, as well as the latest condition of that journalist and the work for dealing with the aftermath; whether the Police will institute disciplinary proceedings against the police officers who operated the water cannon vehicle on that day?





Question 5
(For oral reply)

(Translation)

Law enforcement by police officers in public events

Hon James TO to ask:
It has been almost six months since the eruption of the disturbances arising from the opposition to the proposed legislative amendments. It has been reported that the acts of some police officers in handling public events have aroused public concerns. Such acts include firing a number of tear gas rounds at universities and residential areas, shooting and injuring demonstrators under unwarranted situations, running a motor cycle into demonstrators, firing sponge rounds at journalists who were performing news covering work, spraying pepper sprays at the face of bystanders and journalists at close range, cursing and arresting bystanders, arresting District Council members who were at the scenes of demonstrations observing the situation, and arresting members of the public who donated supplies such as clothes and food. In this connection, will the Government inform this Council:
(1)
of the details of the cases in which police officers fired live ammunition and rubber bullets respectively during public events since June this year, including the number of police officers involved, the number of bullets fired, the resultant casualties (with a breakdown by demonstrators, journalists and members of the public), the body parts of the injured to which injuries were sustained, as well as the current number of persons who are now hospitalized;
(2)
of the respective numbers of police officers who were subject to complaints, warnings, suspension from frontline duties, orders to take leave, criminal investigations, and punishments, as a result of breaches or suspected breaches of the Police General Orders or the guidelines on the use of force since June this year; whether the newly appointed Commissioner of Police will order police officers to exercise restraint when performing duties, impose severe punishment on the police officers breaching the relevant requirements, and refer cases of police officers being alleged of having committed criminal offences to the Department of Justice for consideration of whether or not prosecutions should be instituted; and
(3)
as the International Expert Panel set up by the Independent Police Complaints Council ("IPCC") a few months ago has indicated early this month that with a shortfall in IPCC powers and its independent investigative capability, it is necessary to enhance IPCC's capability to gather evidence before IPCC can complete its interim report, and it has also proposed that a more comprehensive inquiry should be conducted by an independent body as a next step, whether the Government will consider the Panel's proposal and make public fully the interim report?





Question 6
(For oral reply)

(Translation)

A man wounded by a gunshot fired by a police officer

Dr Hon KWOK Ka-ki to ask:
It has been reported that on the 11th of this month, a traffic police officer, while clearing roadblocks, pulled out his service revolver and pointed it at the chest of a man several feet away. The two persons then drew close to each other and got into a scuffle. While grabbing that man in a headlock with his left arm, the traffic police officer pointed his service revolver at another unarmed, black-clad man walking toward him, and fired at him without giving a warning. The black-clad man was shot and fell to the ground. Without examining the injuries of the black-clad man who was lying face down on the ground and unresponsive, an anti-riot police officer, who subsequently arrived for reinforcement, used plastic strings to tie the left hand of that man, turned him over and pulled him up to sit on the ground. The man wounded with the gunshot was subsequently taken to the hospital for treatment and was in a critical condition at one time. In this connection, will the Government inform this Council:
(1)
as Chapter 29 of the Police General Orders stipulates that the level of force to be used by police officers shall be minimal and reasonably required under the prevailing circumstances, whether it has studied if the shooting by the traffic police officer was in breach of the requirement, and whether it has assessed his psychological quality at the time of the incident to see if he was fit to perform duty;
(2)
if there are guidelines stipulating that police officers must, when making an arrest, gain an understanding about whether an arrestee is injured and the degree of injuries he or she has sustained, as well as how to avoid exacerbating the injuries of an injured person during the arrest; if there are such guidelines, whether it has studied if the aforesaid way of handling by the anti-riot police officer was in breach of the guidelines; and
(3)
given that the news organization which videotaped the incident issued a statement criticizing the Police for showing the relevant footage at a police press conference without obtaining its consent, and that the footage shown was incomplete, thus failing to let members of the public understand the whole story of the incident, whether the Police will apologize to the news organization, and whether the Police has assessed the impact of such practice on its credibility?





Question 7
(For written reply)

(Translation)

Impacts of social disturbances on the tourism industry

Hon WONG Ting-kwong to ask:
Some members of the tourism industry have relayed that the disturbances arising from the opposition to the proposed legislative amendments, which erupted in June this year and have not yet subsided, have dealt a heavy blow to Hong Kong's tourism industry and affected the livelihood of the practitioners of the tourism industry. In this connection, will the Government inform this Council:
(1)
whether it has estimated the economic losses caused to the tourism industry by the social disturbances since June this year; if so, of the amount of money;
(2)
given that so far 40 countries/regions have issued alerts/advice on travelling to Hong Kong, whether it knows if the Hong Kong Tourism Board ("HKTB") has, in response to such situation, (i) made adjustments, (ii) rolled out new measures, and (iii) increased the budgeted expenditure, in respect of the publicity and promotion work targeting at the various visitor source markets; if HKTB has, of the details; if not, the reasons for that;
(3)
given that HKTB has cancelled this year's Hong Kong Wine & Dine Festival and Hong Kong Cyclothon originally scheduled to be held last month, whether it knows (i) if HKTB has estimated the resultant impacts on and the economic losses so suffered by the tourism industry, and (ii) how HKTB will deal with the unspent funds earmarked for holding those two events;
(4)
whether it knows if HKTB is considering the cancellation of the large-scale tourism promotion events to be held in the coming six months, and the factors being considered by HKTB;
(5)
whether it knows the specific contents of and the budgeted expenditure for the promotional programme "Hong Kong Takes Off Again" to be rolled out by HKTB; and
(6)
given that starting from September this year, Hong Kong tourist guides and tour escorts may apply to the Mainland authorities for working in Hengqin New Area, Zhuhai, whether it knows the respective numbers of applications received, approved and rejected by the Mainland authorities so far?





Question 8
(For written reply)

(Translation)

Development and application of autonomous vehicles

Hon Martin LIAO to ask:
The Transport and Housing Bureau has recently indicated that the Government "will consider legislative amendments to stipulate the conditions and supporting measures required for trials of autonomous vehicles so as to foster a suitable and safe road environment for such trials and promote the development and application of autonomous vehicles". In this connection, will the Government inform this Council:
(1)
of the specific plans and contents in respect of its work in considering legislative amendments, and whether it has formulated plans to facilitate the conduct of trials of autonomous vehicles ("AVs") in ordinary road environment under safe circumstances;
(2)
of the details of the trials of various models of AVs conducted currently at designated locations in Hong Kong, as well as the technological development stage reached so far;
(3)
whether it has assessed the material support that needs to be provided by the Government to facilitate the development of autonomous driving in Hong Kong, e.g. assisting in perfecting the innovation and technology ecosystem that comprises essential elements such as big data, advanced networks, smart road infrastructure; if so, of the details; if not, the reasons for that;
(4)
whether it will follow the practices of some technologically advanced places by formulating a strategy and interim development goals for the development of AV transport and drawing up a roadmap and an implementation timetable for this purpose; if so, of the details; if not, the reasons for that; and
(5)
as it is anticipated by some technologically advanced places that AVs not only can generate huge business opportunities, but may also, along with the continued development of technologies such as artificial intelligence and ultra high-speed network, bring revolutionary changes to the way in which a society operates, including significantly enhancing road safety, providing highly efficient transportation services featured by public and private passenger and freight transport that operates on a round-the-clock and beck-and-call basis, enabling the efficient use of roads and reducing the demand for car parking spaces, and significantly reducing the need for owning a vehicle, whether the authorities have also articulated a vision for the development of autonomous driving in Hong Kong; if so, of the details?





Question 9
(For written reply)

(Translation)

Pharmacists practising in community pharmacies

Hon SHIU Ka-fai to ask:
Some representatives of the pharmacy trade and pharmacists have relayed to me that registered pharmacists practising in community pharmacies may perform an important function of enhancing primary healthcare services, thereby alleviating the burden on the public healthcare system. For example, they may provide members of the public with services such as drug consultation and inspection, guidance on proper medication, simple tests (measuring cholesterol, blood glucose and blood pressure levels), and advice on seeking medical treatment. On the other hand, the pharmaceutical trade has been fighting for over a decade for implementing in Hong Kong a system of separation of prescribing from dispensing of drugs ("SPD") (i.e. doctors being responsible for disease diagnosis and prescription only while pharmacists for drug dispensing). However, the Government has not given any definite response so far. In this connection, will the Government inform this Council:
(1)
given that pharmacists are not included in the 10 types of healthcare professionals covered by the current Elderly Health Care Voucher Scheme, whether the Government will include pharmacists in the Scheme to increase the options of primary healthcare services available to the elderly under the Scheme; if so, of the details and implementation timetable; if not, the reasons for that;
(2)
whether it studied, in the past three years, the functions that may be performed by registered pharmacists in primary healthcare services; if so, of the details; if not, whether it will conduct such a study expeditiously;
(3)
given that at present, quite a number of places (e.g. the United States, the United Kingdom, Taiwan, Beijing and Macao) have implemented SPD, whether the Government will make reference to the relevant practices and implement SPD in Hong Kong expeditiously; if so, of the details and implementation timetable; if not, the reasons for that; and
(4)
whether it has assessed the conditions that need to be met in order to achieve the dispensing of drugs in qualified community pharmacies to patients with prescriptions by doctors in public hospitals; whether it will launch a pilot scheme which adopts this drug dispensing method to ameliorate the manpower shortage problem in public hospitals and provide patients with an additional option; if so, of the details and implementation timetable of such a scheme; if not, the reasons for that?





Question 10
(For written reply)

(Translation)

An arrest on 20 October

Hon LEUNG Yiu-chung to ask:
It is learnt that on the afternoon of 20 October this year, anti-riot police officers stopped a male passer-by on Jordan Road, and arrested him for the offence of unlawful assembly. While he was being detained, his legal representative had enquired of the Police about the identity of the police officer who made the arrest. However, the Police gave different answers on three occasions. On the first occasion, the answer was that the police officer belonged to the Police Tactical Unit, but details of his identity could not be disclosed owing to the sensitivity of his identity; on the second occasion, the answer was that they had no idea; on the third occasion, the answer was that the police officer belonged to the Commercial Crime Bureau. Furthermore, the Police had continued to detain the man without instituting any prosecution. His legal representative has pointed out that the Police are not empowered to detain members of the public arbitrarily, and must expeditiously and, within 48 hours from the time of arrest, make the decision of either laying charges against or releasing the arrestees. Considering that the Police's actions of arresting and detaining his client were unlawful, that legal representative made an application to the High Court on 21 October for a writ of habeas corpus, demanding the Police to release his client. The representative of the Department of Justice indicated in the court that the man would not be prosecuted, and the man was then released. In this connection, will the Government inform this Council:
(1)
of the reasons why the Police gave three different answers to the enquiry about the identity of the police officer concerned;
(2)
whether it has assessed if the reasons mentioned in (1) are appropriate; if it has assessed and the outcome is in the affirmative, of the justifications for that;
(3)
of the meaning of the Police's claim that the identity of the aforesaid police officer was sensitive; whether there were similar cases in the past three years in which the Police refused to disclose the identities of police officers on the same grounds; if so, of the number and details of such cases;
(4)
whether the Police have reviewed if the police officer concerned had reasonable justifications for arresting the man; if they have reviewed and the outcome is in the affirmative, of the details and the reasons for not instituting any prosecution in the end; if the review outcome is in the negative, whether they have examined if the police officer concerned had abused his power; if they have examined and the outcome is in the affirmative, whether the Police will follow up the matter and refer the case to the Independent Commission Against Corruption for follow-up; if so, of the details; if not, the reasons for that; and
(5)
whether the police officer concerned, when stopping the man, forced him to kneel down with his hands laced behind his head; of the legislation based on which the Police may require suspected offenders to kneel down with their hands laced behind their heads, as well as the criteria for or guidelines on invoking the legal provisions concerned; the actions that may be taken by the police officers at the scene when the persons who are stopped refuse to kneel down with their hands laced behind their heads, and whether such persons may be prosecuted as a result; if so, of the charge to be laid against them?





Question 11
(For written reply)

(Translation)

Review of the Air Quality Objectives

Hon Kenneth LEUNG to ask:
The Government conducted a public consultation on 2025 Air Quality Objectives Review from July to October this year. The consultation paper recommends, among others, that the average 24-hour concentration limit stipulated for fine suspended particulates (i.e. PM2.5) in the Air Quality Objectives ("AQOs") be tightened, but that the number of exceedances allowed be relaxed from the current level of 9 to 35 a year. In this connection, will the Government inform this Council:
(1)
as an environmental group has pointed out that the longer the duration for which members of the public are exposed to air pollutants, the greater the health risks they will face, whether the Government will consider afresh shelving the aforesaid recommendation of relaxing the number of allowable exceedances; if not, of the justifications for that;
(2)
as the findings of the 2025 air quality assessment have shown that the concentrations of ozone and respirable suspended particulates (i.e. PM10) in most parts of Hong Kong will exceed the relevant levels set by the World Health Organization, whether the Government will consider exploring expeditiously the tightening of the concentration limit targets of those two types of air pollutants; if so, of the details; if not, the justifications for that; and
(3)
as the Police have frequently fired tear gas rounds during public events in recent months, and according to some academics, it is very likely that tear gas rounds will give off dioxins during the combustion process, whether the Government will consider installing additional equipment at the 13 existing general air quality monitoring stations or adopting other measures for real-time monitoring of dioxin concentrations, so that members of the public may take actions to minimize personal health risks as necessary; if not, of the justifications for that?





Question 12
(For written reply)

(Translation)

Modification works for public play spaces

Hon Tony TSE to ask:
The Chief Executive has indicated in this year's Policy Address that the Government "plan[s] to modify more than 170 public play spaces managed by the Leisure and Cultural Services Department ('LCSD') over the next five years. To make the facilities more innovative and fun, while meeting the needs of residents, LCSD will encourage and promote community participation and public engagement in the process of modifying these facilities". In this connection, will the Government inform this Council:
(1)
of the locations and areas of the aforesaid public play spaces, as well as the timetable and estimated expenditure for the relevant modification works;
(2)
whether it will consider organizing an open design competition for the modification works for public play spaces in order to make the relevant facilities more innovative and fun through engaging the participation of the relevant professionals; and
(3)
whether it will make special arrangements for the modification works at the policy or tender level to encourage more small and medium enterprises, start-up companies and less experienced professionals to participate in the relevant works?





Question 13
(For written reply)

(Translation)

Use of weapons by police officers

Hon Gary FAN to ask:
Since the eruption of the "anti-extradition to China" movement in June this year, the Police have deployed, for dealing with hundreds of large-scale public events, specialized crowd management vehicles (commonly known as "water cannon vehicles") from 25 August onwards to spray coloured water to disperse crowds, and issued extendable batons and pepper sprays to off-duty police officers from 10 September and 15 October onwards respectively to facilitate their discharge of duties in case of emergency. In this connection, will the Government inform this Council:
(1)
as many members of the public who were hit by the coloured water sprayed from water cannon vehicles experienced stinging sensations in their eyes and intense burning sensations on their skin, of the respective chemical compositions of the colouring materials and pepper based solutions in the coloured water; if such information cannot be made public, of the reasons for that;
(2)
as the Police have indicated that the coloured water can help the Police identify demonstrators, of the to-date number of demonstrators arrested by the Police by such means, with a tabulated breakdown by the date, time and venue of the relevant public events and the offence allegedly committed by the arrestees;
(3)
of the to-date total number of off-duty police officers who have been issued with extendable batons and pepper sprays by the Police;
(4)
as the Police have indicated that they will conduct a review of the arrangement one month after issuing extendable batons to off-duty police officers, whether such a review has been conducted as scheduled; if so, of the outcome; if not, the reasons for that;
(5)
whether the Police have conducted any review of the arrangement of issuing pepper sprays to off-duty police officers; if so, of the outcome; if not, the reasons for that;
(6)
of the utilization of extendable batons and pepper sprays by off-duty police officers for discharging duties (including the number of off-duty police officers using such weapons in public events, with a tabulated breakdown by the date on which and the place at which those weapons were used); and
(7)
whether police officers will be granted overtime allowances for the off-duty hours during which they discharged duties by using the extendable batons or pepper sprays; if so, of the total amount of payment made so far; if not, the reasons for that?





Question 14
(For written reply)

(Translation)

Law enforcement by police officers on private premises

Hon WU Chi-wai to ask:
The Police have stated that under sections 50(3) and (4) of the Police Force Ordinance (Cap. 232), if police officers have reasonable doubts that someone may have committed a criminal offence in any public or private place, police officers have the power to enter the place concerned to make arrests. Section 50(3) of Cap. 232 provides that "[i]f any police officer has reason to believe that any person to be arrested has entered into or is in any place the person residing in or in charge of such place shall on demand of that police officer allow him free ingress thereto and afford all reasonable facilities for search therein". Regarding law enforcement by police officers on private premises (including various types of subsidized sale housing), will the Government inform this Council:
(1)
of the respective numbers of searches, conducted by police officers in each month since June this year under (a) sections 50(3) or (4) of Cap. 232 and (b) search warrants issued by magistrates, involving entry into the following types of private premises: (i) shopping arcades, (ii) shops outside shopping arcades, (iii) common areas outside residential buildings in private housing estates (e.g. private roads and gardens), (iv) common areas of private residential buildings (e.g. lobbies and staircases), (v) private residential flats, and (vi) others (set out in the table below);
MonthThe power under which police officers entered the premises concerned(i)(ii)(iii)(iv)(v)(vi)Total
 (a)       
(b)       
        
 Total       
(2)
of the number of persons arrested in each month since June this year by police officers on private premises, with a breakdown by the six types of premises mentioned in (1) (set out in a table of the same format as the table above);
(3)
as some members of the public are concerned that in recent months, some police officers, in the absence of any definite person(s) to be arrested, forced entry into private housing estates and shopping arcades, and conducted stop-and-searches on the residents and customers of shopping arcades in the form of fishing expedition, whether the Security Bureau and the Police Force have reviewed such mode of operation, and whether they have found cases in which police officers entered private premises to enforce the law without lawful authorization under Cap. 232; if they have found such cases, of the details;
(4)
whether it is mandatory for police officers, when entering private premises under sections 50(3) of Cap. 232, to provide, either proactively or on request, information to "the person residing in or in charge of such place" as referred to in that subsection to prove that there is/are "person(s) to be arrested" on the premises; if so, of the details of the relevant information; if not, the reasons for that;
(5)
of the number of occasions in each month since June this year on which police officers used weapons in the common areas in private housing estates (including various types of subsidized sale housing), with a breakdown of the quantities of the weapons used by name of estate and type of weapon (e.g. tear gas rounds, sponge rounds and bean bag rounds);
(6)
whether section 50 of Cap. 232 authorizes the Police to carry out dispersal operations on private premises; if not, of the provisions in Cap. 232 under which the Police may carry out such operations on private premises;
(7)
of the pieces of legislation, apart from Cap. 232, that authorize the Police to enforce the law and carry out dispersal operations by means of firing tear gas rounds, etc. on private premises; and
(8)
of the details of the guidelines and notices issued by the Police since June this year to the property management sector on issues relating to the entry of police officers into private premises to carry out law enforcement actions?





Question 15
(For written reply)

(Translation)

Tear gas rounds

Prof Hon Joseph LEE to ask:
Since the eruption of the "anti-extradition to China" movement in June this year, the Police have fired thousands of tear gas rounds to disperse demonstrators. It has been reported that on the 2nd of this month, a volunteer first-aider was allegedly shot by a tear gas round made in China which resulted in serious burns on his back. Besides, as measured by some reporters at the scenes of conflicts, the temperature of the sparks discharged during combustion of tear gas rounds was as high as 252 degrees Celsius, which can set alight miscellaneous objects and cause second degree burns in human bodies. In this connection, will the Government inform this Council:
(1)
of the total number of tear gas rounds fired by the Police since June this year, and in respect of the 10 days on which the largest quantities of tear gas rounds were fired, the (i) relevant dates, (ii) quantities of tear gas rounds fired and (iii) locations where they were fired;
(2)
whether, at present, the Police have procured tear gas rounds which are not made in China; if so, (a) of the places of origin of such tear gas rounds, and (b) how such tear gas rounds compare with those which are made in China in the following aspects: (i) composition, (ii) velocity of explosion, (iii) power (including the functions, effects and the highest temperature during combustion), and (iv) possible impacts on human health (set out in a table); if not, the reasons for that;
(3)
whether the Police have, before procurement, conducted tests for the tear gas rounds made in China on the various aspects mentioned in (2); if so, of the details of the test results; and
(4)
whether the Police have issued guidelines to police officers, relevant government departments, public organizations and members of the public in respect of how to clean up tear gas residue at the scenes where tear gas rounds have been fired and how to deal with the aftermath; if so, of the details; if not, the reasons for that?





Question 16
(For written reply)

(Translation)

Welfare-related funds for the Police

Dr Hon Fernando CHEUNG to ask:
Regarding the Police Welfare Fund, the Police Children's Education Trust and the Police Education and Welfare Trust, will the Government inform this Council of the following during the period between 1 June and 31 October this year:
(1)
the details of the incomes of the three funds (set out in Tables 1 to 3);
Table 1: Income of the Police Welfare Fund
IncomeAmount
(i)General Fund
 Donations 
 Government grant 
 Hire of police services 
 Hire of police holiday facilities 
 Interest income from fixed deposits 
 Commission on sale of souvenirs by contractor 
 Miscellaneous receipts 
 Commission from Staff Purchase Scheme contractor 
 Exchange gain 
(ii)Police Band Fund
 Hire of Police Band 
 Donations 
(iii)Sir Shiu-kin TANG Donation Fund (1985)
 Interest income from fixed deposit 
(iv)Music Bursary Fund
 Sale of compact discs 
Table 2: Income of the Police Children's Education Trust
IncomeAmount
Donations 
Interest Income 
Dividend income 
Gain on disposal of investments 
Net exchange gain 
Table 3: Income of the Police Education and Welfare Trust
IncomeAmount
Donations 
Interest income 
Dividend income 
Net exchange gain 
(2)
the details of the expenditures of the three funds (set out in Tables 4 to 6); and
Table 4: Expenditure of the Police Welfare Fund
ExpenditureAmount
(i)General Fund
 Formation welfare grants 
 Grants to Police Tactical Units 
 Grants to various councils, associations, etc. 
 Recurrent expenses on police holiday facilities 
 Grants to police/civilian officers in hardship 
 Refreshments for police officers on special duties 
 Police sports activities expenses 
 Staff relation expenses 
 Grants on death of serving police/civilian officers or pensioners 
 Summer scholarships for police officers' children 
 Healthy Lifestyle Strategy Activities 
 Seminars and Resettlement Training Courses 
 Grants to junior police officers for further education 
 Others 
 Exchange loss 
(ii)Police Band Fund
 Distribution of band fees 
 Purchase and repair of musical instruments 
 Royalties to Composers and Authors Society of Hong Kong Limited 
 Laundry expenses for bandsmen engaged in private functions 
 Miscellaneous expenses 
 Entertainment expenses 
(iii)Sir Shiu-Kin TANG Donation Fund (1985)
 General welfare expenses 
(iv)Music Bursary Fund
 Expenses on training bandsmen 
 Miscellaneous expenses 
(v)Further Education Fund
 Further education grants to police officers 
Table 5: Expenditure of the Police Children's Education Trust
ExpenditureAmount
Bursaries 
Treasurer's remuneration 
Sundry expenses 
Net exchange loss 
Table 6: Expenditure of the Police Education and Welfare Trust
ExpenditureAmount
Bursaries 
Treasurer's remuneration 
Sundry expenses 
Net exchange loss 
(3)
the details of the donations received by the three funds (set out in tables of the same format as Table 7)?
Table 7
Date of receipt of donationsName of donors/
donating organizations
Amount of donationsReasons for donation
    





Question 17
(For written reply)

(Translation)

Land leases expiring in 2047

Dr Hon CHIANG Lai-wan to ask:
The Government has indicated that there are more than 30 000 leases for lands in the New Territories (including New Kowloon) which were made for terms expiring in mid-2047. Regarding the extension of such land leases and related matters, will the Government inform this Council:
(1)
of the following information on the lands, which are under the aforesaid land leases at present and in multiple ownerships, for residential use or for both commercial and residential uses: (i) the total land area, (ii) the number of lots and (iii) the total number of residential units involved (including units for both commercial and residential uses); if the Lands Department ("LandsD") has not kept such information, when LandsD will finish the work to keep the information;
(2)
as LandsD indicated in March 2017 that (i) the compilation of the reference materials on the specific procedures and workflow involved in the processing of lease extension was expected to complete by mid-2017, and (ii) the possibility of further streamlining and shortening the workflow involved would be explored, whether the two tasks have been completed and whether the reference materials have been made public at present; if the tasks have not been completed or the materials have not been made public, of the reasons for that;
(3)
given that a large number of land leases will be expiring in mid-2047, whether LandsD has assessed the additional manpower and financial resources needed for coping with the relevant work, such as collating and compiling information on land leases and extending land leases; if LandsD has, of the additional manpower and estimated expenditure needed;
(4)
whether it will expeditiously make public the terms and procedures for extension of the aforesaid land leases; if not, when it will do so;
(5)
whether financial institutions relayed to the authorities in the past three years that the uncertainty about whether and for how long those land leases could be extended in 2047 had affected their decisions on the applications for mortgage loans related to the properties concerned; if so, of the details; and
(6)
whether it knows if there were cases in the past three years in which financial institutions refused to grant mortgage loans with a term beyond mid-2047 for the properties on a particular land on the grounds that the land lease concerned will expire in that year; if so, of the details?





Question 18
(For written reply)

(Translation)

Law enforcement actions relating to the "anti-extradition to China" movement

Hon Dennis KWOK to ask:
It has been reported that since June this year, during a number of public meetings and processions relating to the "anti-extradition to China" movement, a large number of demonstrators, bystanders and passers-by were arrested, and quite a number of persons were taken to police stations to assist in investigations. In this connection, will the Government inform this Council:
(1)
of the number of persons arrested in each month since June this year, and set out the following figures by reason for arrest (other than the offences under the Prohibition on Face Covering Regulation (Cap. 241K)): (i) the number of persons arrested, (ii) the number of persons released unconditionally subsequent to the arrests, (iii) the number of persons allowed to be released on bail pending further investigations subsequent to the arrests, (iv) the number of persons prosecuted, (v) the number of persons allowed to be released on bail after being brought before the court, and (vi) the number of persons prosecuted for other offences concurrently (set out in tables of the same format as Table 1);
Table 1
Month:             
Reason for arrest(i)(ii)(iii)(iv)(v)(vi)
      
Total     (not applicable)
(2)
of the respective numbers of persons arrested, since the coming into operation of Cap. 241K on 5 October this year, for allegedly (a) having used facial covering that was likely to prevent identification while they were at specified activities and (b) having failed to comply with a police officer's requirement of removing the facial covering, and set out the following figures by the date on which they were arrested: (i) the number of persons arrested, (ii) the number of persons released unconditionally subsequent to the arrests, (iii) the number of persons allowed to be released on bail pending further investigations subsequent to the arrests, (iv) the number of persons prosecuted, and (v) the number of persons allowed to be released on bail after being brought before the court (set out in Table 2);
Table 2
Date of arrestOffence(i)(ii)(iii)(iv)(v)
 (a)     
(b)     
      
Total     
(3)
of the respective numbers of persons (i) released and (ii) detained after being taken by the Police to police stations on each week (from Sunday to Saturday) since 9 June this year to assist in investigations (other than the persons mentioned in (1)) (set out in Table 3);
Table 3
Date(i)(ii)Total
9 June to 15 June   
   
Total   
(4)
of the respective numbers of arrestees who had been detained for a period of more than 48 hours, the statutory limit, before they were (i) released, (ii) brought before a magistrate, and (iii) transferred to hospitals for medical treatment, on each week (from Sunday to Saturday) since 9 June this year (set out in Table 4); and
Table 4
Date(i)(ii)(iii)Total
9 June to 15 June    
    
Total    
(5)
of the respective numbers of vehicles borrowed since 9 June this year by the Police from other government departments for the purpose of transporting (a) arrestees and persons assisting in investigations and (b) police officers, and set out the following information by the department to which the vehicles belonged: (i) the class of vehicles, (ii) the number of seats and (iii) the number of vehicles (set out in Table 5)?
Table 5
DepartmentPurpose(i)(ii)(iii)
 (a)   
(b)   
    
Total(not applicable)(not applicable) 





Question 19
(For written reply)

(Translation)

Illegal felling of Aquilaria Sinensis

Hon Kenneth LAU to ask:
Aquilaria sinensis ("incense tree") is an endangered species listed in an international convention, and therefore the import, export and re-export of agarwood specimens are subject to statutory control. Since incense trees are of medicinal value and their prices are high, a large number of incense trees in the southern part of the Mainland have been felled, with only a small number left at present. Some New Territories villagers have relayed that in recent years, the illegal felling of incense trees in Hong Kong has been rampant, particularly in districts such as Sha Tau Kok, Sai Kung, Sha Tin, Tai Po and Lamma Island. In the Sha Tau Kok Frontier Closed Area, 20 incense trees were illegally felled in 2016, and another one was felled in a recent month. In this connection, will the Government inform this Council
(1)
of the information on cases of illegal felling of incense trees in the past 10 years, including (i) the number of such cases, (ii) the number of persons arrested (and, among them, the number of Mainlanders who entered Hong Kong with travel endorsements or illegally), (iii) the number of prosecutions instituted, (iv) the number of convictions, (v) the punishments imposed in general and (vi) the number and weight of incense trees involved;
(2)
of the number of cases in which agarwood was intercepted at the various boundary control points, and the total weight of agarwood involved, as well as the number of cases of smuggling agarwood by post, in the past five years;
(3)
whether, in the past five years, the Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department and the Customs and Excise Department (i) took joint law enforcement actions, and (ii) took joint law enforcement actions with the relevant Mainland departments, to combat the smuggling of agarwood; if so, of the details;
(4)
of the details of the installation in the past five years of closed-circuit television cameras or Infrared Sensor Camera Traps by the authorities at locations with high risk of illegal felling of incense trees; whether they have assessed the effectiveness of this measure;
(5)
whether it has considered enacting legislation to ban the sale of wild agarwood and its products in Hong Kong; if so, of the details; if not, the reasons for that; and
(6)
whether it has compiled statistics on the current number of incense trees in Hong Kong; whether the authorities have put in place new measures to enhance the protection of incense trees; if so, of the details?





Question 20
(For written reply)

(Translation)

Unlawful acts and improper remarks by civil servants and teachers

Hon Holden CHOW to ask:
Recently, some civil servants made remarks on the Internet discrediting the "one country, two systems", and a civil servant was arrested for alleged participation in an unlawful assembly. Moreover, the Education Bureau ("EDB") earlier on issued a letter of condemnation to two teachers who had made hostile remarks on the Internet against the Police. Some parents hold the view that such disciplinary action is inadequate to reflect the severity of that kind of incidents as the relevant remarks may incite students to take part in unlawful activities. In this connection, will the Government inform this Council:
(1)
of the number of complaints received, since June this year, about civil servants taking part in unlawful assemblies or violent activities, or openly making remarks that discredit the "one country, two systems"; the disciplinary mechanism established for those complaints substantiated, including the circumstances under which the person under complaint will be interdicted; the to-date number of persons interdicted for such acts; and
(2)
of the number of complaints received by EDB, since June this year, about teachers of government schools making hostile remarks against the Police or/and seditious remarks; the disciplinary mechanism established for those complaints substantiated, including the circumstances under which the person under complaint will be suspended from duty; the to-date number of persons suspended from duty for such acts?





Question 21
(For written reply)

(Translation)

Parking spaces for private cars

Hon Jimmy NG to ask:
The number of private cars in Hong Kong increased from 402 000 in 2006 to 626 000 in September 2019 (representing a 56% increase). However, the ratio of parking spaces for private cars to such vehicles dropped from 1.51 in 2006 to 1.1 in 2019, reflecting that the shortage of car parking spaces has aggravated. Regarding parking spaces for private cars, will the Government inform this Council:
(1)
of the numbers, projected for the coming three years, of new car parking spaces to be provided by the Government and private developers, and among such car parking spaces, the number of those for private cars (with a tabulated breakdown by District Council district);
(2)
of the numbers, projected for the coming three years, of (i) public multi-storey car parks to be newly completed and commissioned, and the total number of car parking spaces to be provided therein, as well as (ii) government sites to be let by way of short-term tenancies for use as temporary car parks, and set out the location and the number of car parking spaces to be provided therein for each of such sites;
(3)
whether, in order to alleviate the shortage of car parking spaces, it will expeditiously (i) amend the Hong Kong Planning Standards and Guidelines to raise the standards on the provision of parking spaces for private cars in housing development projects (e.g. changing the current standard of one car parking space per six to nine residential flats to one car parking space per four to five residential flats), and review the demand adjustment ratio, the accessibility adjustment ratio and the development intensity adjustment ratio, as well as (ii) take measures to encourage developers to provide more car parking spaces, so that more parking spaces can be provided in newly completed housing development/redevelopment projects; if so, of the details and timetable; if not, the reasons for that;
(4)
given that the continued increase in size of the private cars manufactured in recent years has made it increasingly frequent that the body of a vehicle crosses the boundary lines of a car parking space and the space between vehicles parked adjacently is insufficient for the vehicle doors to be opened for boarding and alighting, whether the Government will review the size standard for parking spaces; if so, of the details; if not, the reasons for that; and
(5)
as the Transport Department is taking forward pilot projects of automated parking systems involving six sites with a view to providing more car parking spaces, of the projected numbers of parking spaces to be provided by such projects in the coming three years?





Question 22
(For written reply)

(Translation)

Arms and ammunition used by the Police

Hon HUI Chi-fung to ask:
Regarding the arms and ammunition (including tear gas rounds, rubber bullets, bean bag rounds and sponge rounds) used by the Hong Kong Police Force, will the Government inform this Council:
(1)
of the quantity, name of manufacturer and place of origin of each type of the arms that each operation unit is equipped with (set out in tables);
(2)
whether the Police have kept a record of each police officer's use of arms on each occasion and the reason(s) therefor; if so, of the details; if not, the reasons for that;
(3)
whether the Police have put in place measures to ensure that all ammunition in stock is within the expiry dates set by the manufacturers; if so, of the details; if not, the reasons for that;
(4)
of the Police's considerations for determining the ways to handle the expired ammunition, and whether police officers used any expired ammunition while on duty in the past six months; if so, of the reasons for that;
(5)
as some reporters picked up at the scenes of demonstrations some shells of tear gas rounds with the expiry dates scratched off, whether the Police have concealed its continued use of the expired tear gas rounds by scratching off the expiry dates on them; and
(6)
as the Commissioner of Police has appointed, under section 40 of the Public Order Ordinance (Cap. 245), a batch of officers of the Correctional Services Department as special constables, of the difference between such special constables and police officers in terms of their arms while on duty?